Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Validity and reliability of the XSENSOR in-shoe pressure measurement system

Price, C; Parker, DJ; Andrews, J

Validity and reliability of the XSENSOR in-shoe pressure measurement system Thumbnail


Authors

J Andrews



Abstract

Background
In-shoe pressure measurement systems are used in research and clinical practice to quantify areas and levels of pressure underfoot whilst shod. Their validity and reliability across different pressures, durations of load and contact areas determine their appropriateness to address different research questions or clinical assessments. XSENSOR is a relatively new pressure measurement device and warrants assessment.

Research question
Does the XSENSOR in-shoe pressure measurement device have sufficient validity and reliability for clinical assessments in diabetes?

Methods
Two XSENSOR insoles were examined across two days with two lab-based protocols to assess regional and whole insole loading. The whole insole protocol applied 50–600 kPa of pressure across the insole surface for 30 seconds and measured at 0, 2, 10 and 30 seconds. The regional protocol used two (3.14 and 15.9 cm2 surface area) cylinders to apply pressures of 50, 110 and 200 kPa to each insole. Three trials of all conditions were averaged. The validity (% difference and Root Mean Square Error: RMSE) and repeatability (Bland Altman, Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient: ICC) of the target pressures (whole insole) and contact area (regional) were outcome variables.

Results
Regional results demonstrated mean contact area errors of less than 1 cm2 for both insoles and high repeatability (≥0.939). Whole insole measurement error was higher at higher pressures but resulted in average peak and mean pressures error < 10%. Reliability error was 3–10% for peak pressure, within the 15% defined as an analytical goal.

Significance
Errors associated with the quantification of pressure are low enough that they are unlikely to influence the assessments of interventions or screening of the at-risk-foot considering clinically relevant thresholds. Contact area is accurate due to a high spatial resolution and the repeatability of the XSENSOR system likely makes it appropriate for clinical applications that require multiple assessments.

Citation

Price, C., Parker, D., & Andrews, J. (2023). Validity and reliability of the XSENSOR in-shoe pressure measurement system. PLoS ONE, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277971

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 8, 2022
Online Publication Date Jan 17, 2023
Publication Date Jan 17, 2023
Deposit Date Jan 31, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jan 31, 2023
Journal PLoS ONE
Publisher Public Library of Science
Pages 1-12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277971
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277971

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations