Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Muscle architectural and force-velocity curve adaptations following 10 weeks of training with weightlifting catching and pulling derivatives

Suchomel, T; McKeever, S; Nolen, J; Comfort, P

Muscle architectural and force-velocity curve adaptations following 10 weeks of training with weightlifting catching and pulling derivatives Thumbnail


Authors

T Suchomel

S McKeever

J Nolen



Abstract

The aims of this study were to examine the muscle architectural, rapid force production, and force-velocity curve adaptations following 10 weeks of resistance training with either submaximal weightlifting catching (CATCH) or pulling (PULL) derivatives or pulling derivatives with phase-specific loading (OL). 27 resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to the CATCH, PULL, or OL groups and completed pre- and post-intervention ultrasound, countermovement jump (CMJ), and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP). Vastus lateralis and biceps femoris muscle thickness, pennation angle, and fascicle length, CMJ force at peak power, velocity at peak power, and peak power, and IMTP peak force and force at 100-, 150-, 200-, and 250 ms were assessed. There were no significant or meaningful differences in muscle architecture measures for any group ( > 0.05). The PULL group displayed small-moderate ( = 0.25-0.81) improvements in all CMJ variables while the CATCH group displayed trivial effects ( = 0.00-0.21). In addition, the OL group displayed trivial and small effects for CMJ force ( = -0.12-0.04) and velocity variables ( = 0.32-0.46), respectively. The OL group displayed moderate ( = 0.48-0.73) improvements in all IMTP variables while to PULL group displayed small-moderate ( = 0.47-0.55) improvements. The CATCH group displayed trivial-small ( = -0.39-0.15) decreases in IMTP performance. The PULL and OL groups displayed visible shifts in their force-velocity curves; however, these changes were not significant (p > 0.05). Performing weightlifting pulling derivatives with either submaximal or phase-specific loading may enhance rapid and peak force production characteristics. Strength and conditioning practitioners should load pulling derivatives based on the goals of each specific phase, but also allow their athletes ample exposure to achieve each goal. [Abstract copyright: © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.]

Citation

Suchomel, T., McKeever, S., Nolen, J., & Comfort, P. (2022). Muscle architectural and force-velocity curve adaptations following 10 weeks of training with weightlifting catching and pulling derivatives. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 21(4), 504-516. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2022.504

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 28, 2022
Publication Date Dec 1, 2022
Deposit Date Jan 12, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jan 12, 2023
Journal Journal of sports science & medicine
Print ISSN 1303-2968
Volume 21
Issue 4
Pages 504-516
DOI https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2022.504
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2022.504

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations