E Cox
The cost-effectiveness of the SMART work & life intervention for reducing sitting time
Cox, E; Walker, S; Edwardson, CL; Biddle, SJH; Clarke-Cornwell, AM; Clemes, SA; Davies, MJ; Dunstan, DW; Eborall, H; Granat, MH; Gray, LJ; Healy, GN; Maylor, BD; Munir, F; Yates, T; Richardson, G
Authors
S Walker
CL Edwardson
SJH Biddle
Dr Alex Clarke-Cornwell A.M.Clarke-Cornwell@salford.ac.uk
Reader
SA Clemes
MJ Davies
DW Dunstan
H Eborall
Prof Malcolm Granat M.H.Granat@salford.ac.uk
Professor
LJ Gray
GN Healy
BD Maylor
F Munir
T Yates
G Richardson
Abstract
Sedentary behaviours continue to increase and are associated with heightened risks of morbidity and mortality. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of SMART Work & Life (SWAL), an intervention designed to reduce sitting time inside and outside of work, both with (SWAL-desk) and without (SWAL-only) a height-adjustable workstation compared to usual practice (control) for UK office workers. Health outcomes were assessed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and costs in pound sterling (2019–2020). Discounted costs and QALYs were estimated using regression methods with multiply imputed data from the SMART Work & Life trial. Absenteeism, productivity and wellbeing measures were also evaluated. The average cost of SWAL-desk was £228.31 and SWAL-only £80.59 per office worker. Within the trial, SWAL-only was more effective and costly compared to control (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): £12,091 per QALY) while SWAL-desk was dominated (least effective and most costly). However, over a lifetime horizon, both SWAL-only and SWAL-desk were more effective and more costly than control. Comparing SWAL-only to control generated an ICER of £4985 per QALY. SWAL-desk was more effective and costly than SWAL-only, generating an ICER of £13,378 per QALY. Findings were sensitive to various worker, intervention, and extrapolation-related factors. Based on a lifetime horizon, SWAL interventions appear cost-effective for office-workers conditional on worker characteristics, intervention cost and longer-term maintenance in sitting time reductions.
Citation
Cox, E., Walker, S., Edwardson, C., Biddle, S., Clarke-Cornwell, A., Clemes, S., …Richardson, G. (2022). The cost-effectiveness of the SMART work & life intervention for reducing sitting time. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 14861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214861
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 9, 2022 |
Publication Date | Nov 11, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Nov 14, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 14, 2022 |
Journal | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Publisher | MDPI |
Volume | 18 |
Issue | 22 |
Pages | 14861 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214861 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214861 |
Additional Information | Projects : The effectiveness of the SMArT Work & Life intervention for reducing sitting time in office workers |
Files
Published Version
(696 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search