Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The binomial-match, outcome uncertainty, and the case of netball

Baker, R; Chadwick, S; Parma, R; Scarf, P

Authors

R Baker

S Chadwick

R Parma

P Scarf



Abstract

We introduce the binomial-match as a model for the bivariate score in a paired-contest. This model is naturally associated with sports in which the restart alternates following a goal. The model is a challenger to the Poisson-match, a pair of independent Poisson random variables whose means are related to the strengths of the competing teams. We use the binomial-match primarily to study the relationship between outcome uncertainty and scoring-rate, particularly for high values of the scoring-rate. Netball has a high scoring-rate and motivates our model development. In the binomial-match framework, we also evaluate rule-variations, and study tactical play in netball. Our analysis suggests that the binomial-match is not a better forecaster than the Poisson-match, but it is better for representing outcome uncertainty and evaluating rule-variations and tactics. In general, we find that the binomial-match implies greater outcome uncertainty than the Poisson match, for a given scoring-rate, and that an alternating-restart is a good rule for reducing the frequency of tied outcomes. For netball in particular, we show that starting the final quarter with possession in a close, balanced match may confer a significant advantage.

Citation

Baker, R., Chadwick, S., Parma, R., & Scarf, P. (2021). The binomial-match, outcome uncertainty, and the case of netball. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(8), 1856-1872. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1931496

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 11, 2021
Online Publication Date Jun 21, 2021
Publication Date Jun 21, 2021
Deposit Date Oct 10, 2022
Journal Journal of the Operational Research Society
Print ISSN 0160-5682
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Volume 73
Issue 8
Pages 1856-1872
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1931496
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1931496


Downloadable Citations