Dr Nicholas Ripley N.J.Ripley@salford.ac.uk
Lecturer
Comparison between methods to estimate bicep femoris fascicle length from three estimation equations using a 10 cm ultrasound probe
Ripley, NJ; Comfort, P; McMahon, JJ
Authors
Prof Paul Comfort P.Comfort@salford.ac.uk
Professor of Strength & Conditioning
Mr John McMahon J.J.McMahon@salford.ac.uk
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine the reliability and differences between three fascicle length (FL) estimation methods when utilizing a 10-cm ultrasound (US) probe. Thirteen males (24.1 ± 3.8 years, 79.3 ± 14 kg, 179 ± 6.6 cm) participated. Bicep femoris long head (BFLH) US images were collected on two separate occasions. Three previously established extrapolation methods were utilized. Near-perfect reliability was observed for all methods. Criterion estimation resulted in a significant, trivial (p = 0.016,g = 0.17) increase in FL compared to the basic trigonometry equation with non-significant, trivial increase (p = 0.081,g = 0.10) between the criterion and partial measure method. The partial measure method was not significantly or meaningfully greater than the basic trigonometry method (p = 0.286,g = 0.08). Both alternative methods demonstrated unacceptable LOA (>5%), with heteroscedasticity. All methods of extrapolation are reliable and could be used over time. However, as methods are not comparable, there could be a rationale to utilize underestimated results to ensure a degree of cushioning.
Citation
Ripley, N., Comfort, P., & McMahon, J. (2022). Comparison between methods to estimate bicep femoris fascicle length from three estimation equations using a 10 cm ultrasound probe. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 27(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2022.2063689
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 5, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 12, 2022 |
Publication Date | Apr 12, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Apr 20, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 13, 2023 |
Journal | Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science |
Print ISSN | 1091-367X |
Electronic ISSN | 1532-7841 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Volume | 27 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 43-50 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2022.2063689 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2022.2063689 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/hmpe20 |
Files
Comparison between methods to estimate bicep femoris fascicle length from three estimation equations using a 10 cm ultrasound probe.pdf
(1.5 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Comparison between methods to estimate bicep femoris fascicle length from three estimation equations using a 10 cm ultrasound probe.pdf
(516 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search