Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Modelling geometric uncertainties in prostate radiotherapy

Sage, J

Authors

J Sage



Contributors

R Harvey
Supervisor

M Fisher
Supervisor

T Ritchings
Supervisor

Abstract

Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) presents a range of techniques to enhance the
geometric accuracy of radiotherapy treatment. A full evaluation of such techniques,
against increased cost, workload, or unnecessary radiation dose, would require the
incorporation of geometric errors into existing methods for modelling the
effectiveness of radiotherapy treatment. In this work the impact of geometric errors on
the tumour control probability (TCP) for prostate radiotherapy is investigated.
Positional measurement data are analysed in a manner which differentiates between
genuine measured variation and measurement uncertainty. A deformable model of the
prostate is developed which encompasses population variation, interfractional
variation and observer variability. Ultimately a simulation tool is produced to test
different schemes for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of different levels of
geometric uncertainty.
Measurement error is not generally considered in studies of geometric variation in
radiotherapy. Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) is used to separately determine
the measurement error and the random patient position error in a series of external
position measurement for 112 prostate patients. Measurement error can be a
significant component of the measured variation, with serious implications for IGRT
where measurements are used to correct the patient position.
Measurements are made of internal and external errors for 44 patients, comparing
techniques for rectal and bladder preparation. Internal marker seeds are used to
determine prostate position from portal images. Seed based portal imaging is found to
be an effective method for IGRT for patients in all arms of the trial.
Two techniques for modelling prostate shape are investigated. To analyse patterns of
observer variability a method is developed based on the inclusion of image pixels, or
voxels, in the shape volume, using principle component analysis (PCA) of binary
masks. Inclusion probability is found to be a useful concept but the results of the PCA
are poor, demonstrating a high level of dependence between modes. A more
conventional approach, the PCA of boundary vectors, is used to generate a 3D
deformable vector model of the prostate from correlated 2D orthogonal views. The model was trained from data for 28 patients with 2 CT scans and 2 independent
observations of prostate shape per scan. MLE was used to separate the components of
shape variation. Of the total variance observed 35% was due to population variation,
17% due to day to day variation and 48% due to observer variation.
The final simulation tool allows dose to individual tissue elements to be accumulated
over a simulated course of treatment for a treatment population. The tool is used to
calculate TCP for a wide range of situations; investigating the impact of observer
error, target motion, deformation, margin size, IGRT technique, dose prescription and
the use of a high dose boost. The reduction in calculated TCP with margin size is
shown to be continuous, with no clear cut-off point. The reduction in TCP with
'inadequate' margins can be modest and easily offset by small increments in dose.
This clearly validates the recent trend towards small volume, high dose techniques,
even where dose coverage might be compromised. In order to truly determine the
optimum technique the simulation would need to be expanded to incorporate the risk
of damage to the rectum. Even in its current form, the simulation tool still provides a
unique insight into the relationship between the dose-volume prescription, the IGRT
technique and the population TCP; allowing an objective assessment of the relative
benefits of different approaches to prostate radiotherapy.

Citation

Sage, J. Modelling geometric uncertainties in prostate radiotherapy. (Thesis). University of Salford

Thesis Type Thesis
Deposit Date Jul 30, 2021
Award Date May 1, 2011

This file is under embargo due to copyright reasons.

Contact Library-ThesesRequest@salford.ac.uk to request a copy for personal use.





Downloadable Citations