Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Systematic review of interventions to promote the performance of physical distancing behaviours during pandemics/epidemics of infectious diseases spread via aerosols or droplets

Epton, T; Ghio, D; Ballard, LM; Allen, SF; Kassianos, AP; Hewitt, R; Swainston, K; Fynn, WI; Rowland, V; Westbrook, J; Jenkinson, E; Morrow, A; McGeechan, GJ; Stanescu, S; Yousuf, A; Sharma, N; Begum, S; Karasouli, E; Scanlan, D; Shorter, GW; Arden, M; Armitage, C; O'Connor, D; Kamal, A; McBride, E; Swanson, V; Hart, J; Byrne-Davis, L; Chater, A; Drury, J

Authors

T Epton

D Ghio

LM Ballard

SF Allen

AP Kassianos

R Hewitt

K Swainston

WI Fynn

V Rowland

J Westbrook

E Jenkinson

A Morrow

GJ McGeechan

S Stanescu

A Yousuf

N Sharma

S Begum

E Karasouli

D Scanlan

GW Shorter

M Arden

C Armitage

D O'Connor

A Kamal

E McBride

V Swanson

J Hart

L Byrne-Davis

A Chater

J Drury



Abstract

Objectives
Physical-distancing (i.e., keeping 1-2m apart when co-located) can prevent cases of infectious-diseases spread by droplets/aerosols (i.e. SARS-COV2). Distancing is a recommendation/requirement in many countries. This systematic-review aimed to determine which interventions and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) are effective in promoting adherence to physical-distancing and through which potential mechanisms of action (MOAs).

Methods
Six databases were searched for studies of physical-distancing interventions. A narrative synthesis included any design that included a comparator (e.g., pre-intervention versus post-intervention; randomised controlled trial), for any population and year. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. BCTs and potential MoAs were identified in each intervention..

Results
Six papers of moderate/high quality indicated that distancing interventions could successfully change MoAs/behaviour. Successful BCTs (MoAs) included feedback on behaviour (e.g., motivation); information about/ salience of health consequences (e.g., beliefs about consequences) and demonstration (e.g., beliefs about capabilities) and restructuring the physical environment (e.g., environmental context and resources). The most promising interventions were proximity buzzers, directional systems and posters with loss-framed messages that demonstrated the behaviours.

Conclusions
High quality RCTs that measure behaviour, have representative samples and specify/test a larger range of BCTs /MoAs are needed.

Citation

Epton, T., Ghio, D., Ballard, L., Allen, S., Kassianos, A., Hewitt, R., …Drury, J. (2021). Systematic review of interventions to promote the performance of physical distancing behaviours during pandemics/epidemics of infectious diseases spread via aerosols or droplets

Other Type Experiment
Online Publication Date Jun 13, 2021
Publication Date Jun 13, 2021
Deposit Date Jun 15, 2021
Publicly Available Date Jun 15, 2021
DOI https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rn4vb
Related Public URLs https://psyarxiv.com/
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rn4vb
Additional Information Access Information : This is a pre-print paper and has not been through the peer-review process. The link above will direct to the latest version of the paper.
Projects : Facilitating the public response to COVID-19 by harnessing group processes
Grant Number: ES/V005383/1

Files




Downloadable Citations