AEA Chadwell
Addressing unpredictability may be the key to improving performance with current clinically prescribed myoelectric prostheses
Chadwell, AEA; Kenney, LPJ; Thies, SBA; Head, JS; Galpin, AJ; Baker, RD
Authors
Prof Laurence Kenney L.P.J.Kenney@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Dr Sibylle Thies S.Thies@salford.ac.uk
Associate Professor/Reader
JS Head
Dr Adam Galpin A.J.Galpin@salford.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer
RD Baker
Abstract
The efferent control chain for an upper-limb myoelectric prosthesis can be separated into 3 key areas: signal generation, signal acquisition, and device response. Data were collected from twenty trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis users using their own clinically prescribed devices, to establish the relative impact of these potential control factors on user performance (user functionality and everyday prosthesis usage). By identifying the key factor(s), we can guide future developments to ensure clinical impact. Skill in generating muscle signals was assessed via reaction times and signal tracking. To assess the predictability of signal acquisition, we inspected reaction time spread and undesired hand activations. As a measure of device response, we recorded the electromechanical delay between electrode stimulation and the onset of hand movement. Results suggest abstract measures of skill in controlling muscle signals are poorly correlated with performance. Undesired activations of the hand or incorrect responses were correlated with almost all kinematics and gaze measures suggesting unpredictability is a key factor. Significant correlations were also found between several measures of performance and the electromechanical delay; however, unexpectedly, longer electromechanical delays correlated with better performance. Future research should focus on exploring causes of unpredictability, their relative impacts on performance and interventions to address this.
Citation
Chadwell, A., Kenney, L., Thies, S., Head, J., Galpin, A., & Baker, R. (2021). Addressing unpredictability may be the key to improving performance with current clinically prescribed myoelectric prostheses. Scientific reports, 11, 3300. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82764-6
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 17, 2020 |
Publication Date | Feb 8, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Jan 21, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 9, 2021 |
Journal | Scientific Reports |
Print ISSN | 2045-2322 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
Volume | 11 |
Pages | 3300 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82764-6 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82764-6 |
Related Public URLs | http://www.nature.com/srep/index.html |
Files
s41598-021-82764-6.pdf
(2.2 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Why does my prosthetic hand not always do what it is told?
(2022)
Journal Article
Co-creation and user perspectives for upper limb prosthetics
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search