Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Effects of two different hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses on postural stability in subjects with spinal cord injury : a pilot study

Samadian, M; Bani, MA; Golchin, N; Mardani, MA; Head, JS; Arazpour, M

Effects of two different hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses on postural stability in subjects with spinal cord injury : a pilot study Thumbnail


Authors

M Samadian

MA Bani

N Golchin

MA Mardani

JS Head

M Arazpour



Abstract

Purpose
Evaluation of two different hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses (HKAFOs; medial linkage reciprocating gait orthosis [MLRGO] and isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis [IRGO]) using gait and postural stability analysis in four subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Overview of Literature
To the best of our knowledge, no study has evaluated postural stability in subjects with SCI when using MLRGO and IRGO.
Methods
The relative efficacy of each orthosis was evaluated with relevant gait parameters, and an assessment of postural stability and sway during usage was made. Each analysis was conducted following an appropriate period of training and acclimatization. The gait parameters employed in the study were walking speed, cadence, and endurance; these were recorded and analyzed using current, validated methods. Postural stability was assessed using a verified force plate measurement system, and a modified Falls Efficacy Scale (mFES) was used for the measurement of postural sway and the perceived fear of falling.
Results
Walking speed, cadence, and endurance increased with the use of both HKAFOs. When the two types of HKAFOs were compared, all the parameters showed a slight (but not significant) increase with the use of MLRGO compared with the use of IRGO. In contrast, there were slight but insignificant improvements in postural sway with the use of IRGO. However, although there were no significant differences between the two sets of mFES scores, there was a slightly reduced fear of falling with the use of MLRGO compared with the use of IRGO in the static standing position.
Conclusions
It is noteworthy that meaningful interpretations of results can only be drawn if a larger sample is employed. This pilot study showed no significant data; however, the results indicate that the use of MLRGO is superior to that of IRGO in terms of potential improvement in the mobility and confidence levels of subjects with SCI.

Citation

Samadian, M., Bani, M., Golchin, N., Mardani, M., Head, J., & Arazpour, M. (2019). Effects of two different hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses on postural stability in subjects with spinal cord injury : a pilot study. Asian spine journal (Seoul. Online), 13(1), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2017.0283

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 19, 2018
Online Publication Date Oct 18, 2018
Publication Date Jan 1, 2019
Deposit Date Nov 2, 2018
Publicly Available Date Nov 2, 2018
Journal Asian Spine Journal
Print ISSN 1976-1902
Electronic ISSN 1976-7846
Volume 13
Issue 1
Pages 96-102
DOI https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2017.0283
Keywords Fear of falling, Isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis, Medial reciprocating gait linkage orthosis, Stability
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2017.0283
Related Public URLs http://asianspinejournal.org/
Additional Information Funders : University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences
Grant Number: 1299

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations