Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Preemption versus entrenchment : towards a construction-general solution to the problem of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization

Ambridge, B; Bidgood, A; Twomey, KE; Pine, JM; Rowland, CF; Freudenthal, D

Preemption versus entrenchment : towards a construction-general solution to the problem of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization Thumbnail


Authors

B Ambridge

A Bidgood

KE Twomey

JM Pine

CF Rowland

D Freudenthal



Abstract

Participants aged 5;2-6;8, 9;2-10;6 and 18;1-22;2 (72 at each age) rated verb argument structure overgeneralization errors (e.g., *Daddy giggled the baby) using a five-point scale. The study was designed to investigate the feasibility of two proposed construction-general solutions to the question of how children retreat from, or avoid, such errors. No support was found for the prediction of the preemption hypothesis that the greater the frequency of the verb in the single most nearly synonymous construction (for this example, the periphrastic causative; e.g., Daddy made the baby giggle), the lower the acceptability of the error. Support was found, however, for the prediction of the entrenchment hypothesis that the greater the overall frequency of the verb, regardless of construction, the lower the acceptability of
the error, at least for the two older groups. Thus while entrenchment appears to be a robust solution to the problem of the retreat from error, and one that generalizes across different
error types, we did not find evidence that this is the case for preemption. The implication is that the solution to the retreat from error lies not with specialized mechanisms, but rather in a probabilistic process of construction competition.

Citation

Ambridge, B., Bidgood, A., Twomey, K., Pine, J., Rowland, C., & Freudenthal, D. (2015). Preemption versus entrenchment : towards a construction-general solution to the problem of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization. PLoS ONE, 10(4), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123723

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Apr 28, 2015
Publication Date Apr 28, 2015
Deposit Date Oct 8, 2018
Publicly Available Date Oct 8, 2018
Journal PLoS ONE
Publisher Public Library of Science
Volume 10
Issue 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123723
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123723
Additional Information Grant Number: RPG-158
Grant Number: ES/L008955/1

Files





Downloadable Citations