Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Variations in the U-Value measurement of a whole
dwelling using infrared thermography under
controlled conditions

Marshall, AS; Francou, JY; Fitton, R; Swan, WC; Owen, JO; Benjaber, MAA

Variations in the U-Value measurement of a whole
dwelling using infrared thermography under
controlled conditions Thumbnail


Authors

AS Marshall

JY Francou

WC Swan

JO Owen

MAA Benjaber



Abstract

U-values of building elements are often determined using point measurements, where infrared imagery may be used to identify a suitable location for these measurements. Current methods identify that surface areas exhibiting a homogeneous temperature—away from regions of thermal bridging—can be used to obtain U-values. In doing so, however, the resulting U-value is assumed to represent that entire building element, contrary to the information given by the initial infrared inspection. This can be problematic when applying these measured U-values to models for predicting energy performance. Three techniques have been used to measure the U-values of external building elements of a full-scale replica of a pre-1920s U.K. home under controlled conditions: point measurements, using heat flux meters, and two variations of infrared thermography at high and low resolutions. U-values determined from each technique were used to calibrate a model of that building and predictions of the heat transfer coefficient, annual energy consumption, and fuel cost were made. Point measurements and low-resolution infrared thermography were found to represent a relatively small proportion of the overall U-value distribution. By propagating the variation of U-values found using high-resolution thermography, the predicted heat transfer coefficient (HTC) was found to vary between 183 W/K to 235 W/K (±12%). This also led to subsequent variations in the predictions for annual energy consumption for heating (between 4923 kWh and 5481 kWh, ±11%); and in the predicted cost of that energy consumption (between £227 and £281, ±24%). This variation is indicative of the sensitivity of energy simulations to sensor placement when carrying out point measurements for U-values. View Full-Text

Citation

controlled conditions. Buildings, 8(46), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8030046

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 16, 2018
Online Publication Date Mar 19, 2018
Publication Date Mar 19, 2018
Deposit Date Mar 19, 2018
Publicly Available Date Mar 19, 2018
Journal Buildings
Publisher MDPI
Volume 8
Issue 46
Pages 1-17
DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8030046
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings8030046
Related Public URLs http://www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations