Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The EVerT2 (Effective Verruca Treatments) trial : a randomised controlled trial of needling versus nonsurgical debridement for the treatment of plantar verrucae

Hashmi, F; Fairhurst, C; Cockayne, S; Cullen, MB; Bell, K; Coleman, E; Harrison-Blount, MJ; Torgerson, D

Authors

F Hashmi

C Fairhurst

S Cockayne

MB Cullen

K Bell

E Coleman

MJ Harrison-Blount

D Torgerson



Abstract

Background:
Verrucae are a common foot skin pathology which can in some cases persist for many years. Plantar verrucae can be unsightly and painful. There are a range of treatment options including needling.
Objectives:
The EVerT2 trial aimed to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of the needling procedure for the treatment of plantar verrucae, relative to callus debridement.
Methods:
This single centre randomised controlled trial recruited 60 participants (aged 18 years and over with a plantar verruca). Participants were randomised 1:1 to the intervention group (needling) or the control group (debridement of the overlying callus). The primary outcome was clearance of the index verruca at 12 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include recurrence of the verruca; clearance of all verrucae; number of verrucae; size of the index verruca; pain; and participant satisfaction at 12 and 24 weeks. A cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out from the NHS perspective over 12 weeks.
Results:
Sixty eligible patients were randomised (needling group n=29, 48.3%; debridement group n=31, 51.7%) and 53 were included in the primary analysis (needling n=28, 96.6%; debridement n=25, 80.7%). Clearance of the index verruca occurred in 8 (15.1%) participants (needling n=4, 14.3%; debridement n=4, 16.0%, p=0.86). The needling intervention costs were on average £14.33 (95% CI 5.32 to 23.35) more per patient than debridement.
Conclusions:
There is no evidence that the needling technique is more clinically or cost effective than callus debridement. The results show a significant improvement in pain outcomes after needling compared to the debridement treatment alone.
Trial registration number: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16429440

Citation

Hashmi, F., Fairhurst, C., Cockayne, S., Cullen, M., Bell, K., Coleman, E., …Torgerson, D. (2017). The EVerT2 (Effective Verruca Treatments) trial : a randomised controlled trial of needling versus nonsurgical debridement for the treatment of plantar verrucae. British Journal of Dermatology, 177(5), 1285-1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15751

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 15, 2017
Online Publication Date Jun 27, 2017
Publication Date Nov 30, 2017
Deposit Date Jun 19, 2017
Publicly Available Date Nov 6, 2017
Journal British Journal Of Dermatology
Print ISSN 0007-0963
Electronic ISSN 1365-2133
Publisher Wiley
Volume 177
Issue 5
Pages 1285-1292
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15751
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15751
Related Public URLs http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2133

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations