C Swaelens
Type IIIb endoleak and relining : a mathematical model of distraction forces
Swaelens, C; Poole, R; Torella, F; McWilliams, R; England, A; Fisher, R
Authors
R Poole
F Torella
R McWilliams
A England
R Fisher
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the changes in distraction force following relining of a conventional abdominal aortic stent-graft with a type IIIb endoleak using the Nellix endovascular sealing device compared to a unilateral stent-graft.
Methods: Relining is often used to repair type IIIb endoleaks, but the consequences to graft stability are unknown. A mathematical model was constructed based on pressure and volume flow through the stent-grafts, incorporating recognized distraction force equations. Steady flow was presumed at peak systolic pressures to calculate the maximum distraction force, with gravity ignored. Distraction forces for 28- to 36-mm-diameter stent-graft bodies with 16-mm limbs were calculated and compared to forces following relining with single and double Nellix devices or the Renu unilateral device.
Results: Distraction forces for the 28-, 32-, and 36-mm stent-grafts prior to relining were 5.99, 10.21, and 14.99 N, respectively. Similar forces were reported after relining with bilateral Nellix devices (5.86, 10.08, and 14.86 N, respectively). However, use of a unilateral Nellix increased the distraction forces to 9.92, 14.14, and 18.92 N, respectively. These were comparable to the increase observed after relining with a Renu unilateral stent-graft (9.87, 14.09, and 18.86 N, respectively). The proportional increase in distraction force for a unilateral relining ranged from 26% to 66%, with the greatest increase noted in the smaller diameter main bodies.
Conclusion: Relining a stent-graft with a type IIIb endoleak using bilateral Nellix devices does not increase the distraction force. However, a unilateral Nellix device or the Renu system could theoretically increase the distraction force by up to 66%, potentially risking migration and type Ia endoleak. In clinical practice, these results suggest that a relining with bilateral Nellix may have benefits over the Renu unilateral stent-graft.
Citation
Swaelens, C., Poole, R., Torella, F., McWilliams, R., England, A., & Fisher, R. (2016). Type IIIb endoleak and relining : a mathematical model of distraction forces. Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 23(2), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602816631106
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Feb 11, 2016 |
Publication Date | Apr 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jan 25, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 25, 2016 |
Journal | Journal of Endovascular Therapy |
Print ISSN | 1526-6028 |
Electronic ISSN | 1545-1550 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Volume | 23 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 297-301 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602816631106 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602816631106 |
Related Public URLs | http://jet.sagepub.com/ |
Files
Type Endoleak and Relining.pdf
(452 Kb)
PDF
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search