Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The use of hydrogel as an electrode-skin interface for electrode array FES applications

Cooper, G; Barker, AT; Heller, BW; Good, T; Kenney, LPJ; Howard, D

Authors

G Cooper

AT Barker

BW Heller

T Good



Abstract

Functional electrical stimulation is commonly used to restore function in post-stroke patients in upper and lower limb applications. Location of the electrodes can be a problem hence some research groups have begun to experiment with electrode arrays. Electrode arrays are interfaced with a thin continuous hydrogel sheet which is high resistivity to reduce transverse currents between electrodes in the array. Research using electrode arrays has all been conducted in a laboratory environment over short time periods but it is suspected that this approach will not be feasible over longer time periods due to changes in hydrogel resistivity. High resistivity hydrogel samples were tested by leaving them in contact with the skin over a seven day period. The samples became extremely conductive with resistivities reaching around 10-50 Ωm. The effect of these resistivity changes was studied using finite element analysis to solve for the stationary current quasi-static electric field gradient in the tissue. Electrical stimulation efficiency and focality were calculated for both a high and low resistivity electrode-skin interface layer at different tissue depths. The results showed that low resistivity hydrogel produced significant decreases in stimulation efficiency and focality compared to high resistivity hydrogel.

Citation

Cooper, G., Barker, A., Heller, B., Good, T., Kenney, L., & Howard, D. (2011). The use of hydrogel as an electrode-skin interface for electrode array FES applications. Medical Engineering and Physics, 33(8), 967-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.03.008

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Oct 1, 2011
Deposit Date Oct 17, 2011
Journal Medical Engineering & Physics
Print ISSN 1350-4533
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 33
Issue 8
Pages 967-982
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.03.008
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.03.008