Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A comparison of isokinetic and functional methods of assessing bilateral strength imbalance

Jones, PA; Bampouras, TM

Authors

TM Bampouras



Abstract

Muscle strength imbalances have been linked with poor agility performance and higher injury risk. Isokinetic dynamometry has been used to investigate such imbalances; however, this method is impractical and inaccessible for most strength and conditioning coaches. The aim of the study was to compare isokinetic dynamometry with functional field tests for assessing bilateral strength imbalance. Thirteen male athletes from various sports
(mean 6 SD: age 21 6 1.1 years, height 179.8 6 7.0 cm, body
mass 80.8 6 9.7 kg) participated in the study. Knee flexor and extensor strength at 60°·s−1 was assessed for both limbs with the use of isokinetic dynamometry. Field tests involved seated unilateral leg press, horizontal hop, single-leg vertical and drop jumps. Significant differences (p , 0.01) were found when comparing strength dominant (D) and nondominant (ND) limbs for all strength measures, ranging from 4.5% (hop test) to 12.4% (eccentric extension). No significant differences between the right and left limbs were found (p . 0.05). No significant relationships between strength D/ND ratios of isokinetic variables and the field tests were evident (p . 0.05). The findings provide support for the use of field tests to detect imbalances between lower limbs, but the ultimate choice of test used should depend on the specific strength quality that predominates in the sport.

Citation

Jones, P., & Bampouras, T. (2010). A comparison of isokinetic and functional methods of assessing bilateral strength imbalance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(6), 1553-1558. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181dc4392

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jun 1, 2010
Deposit Date May 16, 2011
Journal Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Print ISSN 1064-8011
Publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Issue 6
Pages 1553-1558
DOI https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181dc4392
Keywords asymmetry, field test, injury risk, isokinetic strength
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181dc4392