Dr Sibylle Thies S.Thies@salford.ac.uk
Associate Professor/Reader
Movement variability in stroke patients and controls performing two upper limb functional tasks: a new assessment methodology
Thies, SB; Tresadern, PA; Kenney, LPJ; Smith, J; Howard, D; Goulermas, JY; Smith, C; Rigby, J
Authors
PA Tresadern
Prof Laurence Kenney L.P.J.Kenney@salford.ac.uk
Professor
J Smith
Prof David Howard D.Howard@salford.ac.uk
JY Goulermas
C Smith
J Rigby
Abstract
Background: In the evaluation of upper limb impairment post stroke there remains a gap between detailed kinematic analyses with expensive motion capturing systems and common clinical assessment tests. In particular, although many clinical tests evaluate the performance of functional
tasks, metrics to characterise upper limb kinematics are generally not applicable to such tasks and very limited in scope. This paper reports on a novel, user-friendly methodology that allows for the assessment of both signal magnitude and timing variability in upper limb movement trajectories during functional task performance. In order to demonstrate the technique, we report on a study
in which the variability in timing and signal magnitude of data collected during the performance of two functional tasks is compared between a group of subjects with stroke and a group of individually matched control subjects.
Methods: We employ dynamic time warping for curve registration to quantify two aspects of movement variability: 1) variability of the timing of the accelerometer signals' characteristics and 2) variability of the signals' magnitude. Six stroke patients and six matched controls performed several trials of a unilateral ('drinking') and a bilateral ('moving a plate') functional task on two different days, approximately 1 month apart. Group differences for the two variability metrics were investigated on both days.
Results: For 'drinking from a glass' significant group differences were obtained on both days for
the timing variability of the acceleration signals' characteristics (p = 0.002 and p = 0.008 for test and
retest, respectively); all stroke patients showed increased signal timing variability as compared to
their corresponding control subject. 'Moving a plate' provided less distinct group differences.
Conclusion: This initial application establishes that movement variability metrics, as determined
by our methodology, appear different in stroke patients as compared to matched controls during unilateral task performance ('drinking'). Use of a user-friendly, inexpensive accelerometer makes this methodology feasible for routine clinical evaluations. We are encouraged to perform larger studies to further investigate the metrics' usefulness when quantifying levels of impairment.
Citation
Thies, S., Tresadern, P., Kenney, L., Smith, J., Howard, D., Goulermas, J., …Rigby, J. (2009). Movement variability in stroke patients and controls performing two upper limb functional tasks: a new assessment methodology. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-2
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2009 |
Deposit Date | Jan 4, 2011 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 5, 2016 |
Journal | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation |
Print ISSN | 1743-0003 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Issue | 2 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-2 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-2 |
Files
1743-0003-6-2.pdf
(522 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
You might also like
Why does my prosthetic hand not always do what it is told?
(2022)
Journal Article
Co-creation and user perspectives for upper limb prosthetics
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search