Judicial approaches to contested causation: Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services in context

Miller, CE

Abstract

The decision of the House of Lords in Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services raises important questions about the compensation of employees for occupational injury. In Fairchild, the principal issue was whether an employee could recover where he could prove negligently inflicted injury, but, having worked for more than one employer, not the identity of the person who caused the injury. This article considers the issue in the wider context of judicial responses to uncertainty in personal injury litigation. It suggests that Fairchild raises issues which are little different from those in other personal injury cases where judges have been prepared to take a pragmatic approach to causation, in order to allow a deserving plaintiff to recover damages.

Citation

Miller, C. (2002). Judicial approaches to contested causation: Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services in context. Law, Probability and Risk, 1(2), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/1.2.119

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: Dec 1, 2002
• Deposit Date: Jan 13, 2009
• Journal: Law, Probability and Risk
• Print ISSN: 1470-8396
• Publisher: Oxford University Press
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 119-139
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/1.2.119
• Publisher URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=805042