MMA Khalfan
Concurrent Engineering Readiness Assessment Tool for the Construction Industry
Khalfan, MMA; Anumba, CJ; Carrillo, PM
Authors
CJ Anumba
PM Carrillo
Abstract
The adoption of concurrent engineering (CE) within the software and manufacturing industries has led to significant benefits including improved time-to-market, reduced production cost, improved product quality and active customer involvement. The implementation of CE within construction is also expected to result in positive changes within the industry, as CE has the potential to make construction projects less fragmented, improve project quality, reduce construction time and cut total project cost. It is considered essential within other industries to carry out a readiness assessment of an organization before implementing CE. Therefore, to facilitate the adoption of CE within the construction industry, it is necessary to assess the extent to which organizations in the industry are ready for CE. This would help an organization to view its current performance and areas of weakness so that corrective action could be taken. This paper discusses CE and its implementation within the construction industry and highlights the need for CE readiness assessment. It argues that there is a need for a specific readiness assessment tool for the construction industry and describes the development of a CE readiness assessment model for the construction industry - the BEACON model. The benefits of using the BEACON model are discussed and strategies and considerations for CE implementation are outlined.
Citation
Khalfan, M., Anumba, C., & Carrillo, P. (2005). Concurrent Engineering Readiness Assessment Tool for the Construction Industry. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1(3), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2005.9684591
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2005 |
Deposit Date | Oct 4, 2007 |
Journal | Architectural engineering and design management |
Print ISSN | 1745-2007 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 1 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 163-179 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2005.9684591 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2005.9684591 |
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search