Technique determinants of knee abduction moments during pivoting in female soccer players

Jones, P.A; Herrington, L.C; Graham-Smith, P

Abstract

Background
No previous studies have investigated the optimal technique for pivoting with regard to reducing peak knee abduction moments and potential knee injury risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between technique characteristics and peak knee abduction moments during pivoting.

Methods
Twenty-seven female soccer players [mean (SD); age: 21 (3.8) years, height: 1.67 (0.07) m, and mass: 60.0 (7.2) kg] participated in the study. Three dimensional motion analyses of pivots on the right leg were performed using 10 Qualysis ‘Pro reflex’ infrared cameras (240 Hz). Ground reaction forces were collected from two AMTI force platforms (1200 Hz) embedded into the running track to examine penultimate and final contact. Pearson's correlation coefficients, co-efficients of determination and stepwise multiple regression were used to explore relationships between a range of technique parameters and peak knee abduction moments. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Findings
Stepwise multiple regression found that initial foot progression and initial knee abduction angles together could explain 35% (30% adjusted) of the variation in peak knee abduction moments (F(2,26) = 6.499, P = 0.006).

Interpretation
The results of the present study suggest that initial-foot progression and knee abduction angles are potential technique factors to lower knee abduction moments during pivoting.

Citation

Jones, P., Herrington, L., & Graham-Smith, P. (2016). Technique determinants of knee abduction moments during pivoting in female soccer players. Clinical Biomechanics, 31, 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.012

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Sep 14, 2015
• Online Publication Date: Sep 25, 2015
• Publication Date: Jan 22, 2016
• Deposit Date: Jul 21, 2023
• Journal: Clinical Biomechanics
• Print ISSN: 0268-0033
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 31
• Pages: 107-112
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.012