Nigel K. Harris
Acute Physiological Responses to Strongman Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training
Harris, Nigel K.; Woulfe, Colm J.; Wood, Matthew R.; Dulson, Deborah K.; Gluchowski, Ashley K.; Keogh, Justin B.
Authors
Colm J. Woulfe
Matthew R. Wood
Deborah K. Dulson
Dr Ashley Gluchowski A.Gluchowski@salford.ac.uk
University Fellow
Justin B. Keogh
Contributors
Dr Ashley Gluchowski A.Gluchowski@salford.ac.uk
Data Manager
Abstract
Strongman training (ST) has become an increasingly popular modality, but data on physiological responses are limited. This study sought to determine physiological responses to an ST session compared to a traditional strength exercise training (RST) session. Ten healthy men (23.6 ± 27.5 years, 85.8 ± 10.3 kg) volunteered in a crossover design, where all participants performed an ST session, an RST session, and a resting session within 7 days apart. The ST consisted of sled drag, farmer's walk, 1 arm dumbbell clean and press, and tire flip at loads eliciting approximately 30 seconds of near maximal effort per set. The RST consisted of squat, deadlift, bench press, and power clean, progressing to 75% of 1 repetition maximum. Sessions were equated for approximate total set duration. Blood lactate and salivary testosterone were recorded immediately before and after training sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were measured throughout the resting session, both training protocols and for 80 minutes after training sessions. Analyses were conducted to determine differences in physiological responses within and between protocols. No significant changes in testosterone occurred at any time point for either session. Lactate increased significantly immediately after both sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were all elevated significantly during ST and RST. Heart rate and fat expenditure were significantly elevated compared to resting in both sessions' recovery periods; calorie and carbohydrate expenditures were not. Compared to RST, ST represents an equivalent physiological stimulus on key parameters indicative of potential training-induced adaptive responses. Such adaptations could conceivably include cardiovascular conditioning.
Citation
Harris, N. K., Woulfe, C. J., Wood, M. R., Dulson, D. K., Gluchowski, A. K., & Keogh, J. B. (2016). Acute Physiological Responses to Strongman Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(5), 1397-1408. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000001217
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2016-05 |
Deposit Date | Aug 9, 2023 |
Journal | Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research |
Print ISSN | 1064-8011 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 30 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 1397-1408 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000001217 |
You might also like
Strength Training Messaging Webinar
(2024)
Presentation / Conference
Individual strength changes following a very brief intervention on national strength training guidelines in adults aged 50 - 75 years
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
STRONGER at HOME
(2024)
Digital Artefact
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search