Dr Nabil Hasshim M.N.A.B.M.Hasshim@salford.ac.uk
Lecturer
Dr Nabil Hasshim M.N.A.B.M.Hasshim@salford.ac.uk
Lecturer
Molly Carruthers
Ludovic Ferrand
Maria Augustinova
Benjamin A Parris
Cognitive control is the ability to allocate attention away from stimuli that are irrelevant to achieving a goal, towards stimuli that are. When conflict is anticipated, attention is biased in a global, top-down manner called proactive control and this effortful type of cognitive control is engaged before stimulus onset. The list-wise congruency proportion (LWPC) effect, where the Stroop congruency effect is reduced when there are more incongruent than congruent trials compared to vice versa, has been viewed as one of the prime signatures of this type of cognitive control. However, there has been recent debate about the extent to which this effect should be attributed to proactive control instead of alternative explanations such as simpler associative learning or reactive control. Thus, by using pupillometry (i.e., an indicator of cognitive effort), the present study investigated the extent to which LWPC effects result from effortful proactive control. Experiment 1 employed a classic proportion congruency manipulation while Experiment 2 replaced congruent trials with neutral trials to control for potential effects of associative learning. While in line with past findings, proportion congruency effects were obtained in response times of both experiments and pupillometry showed both proportion congruency and Stroop effects after stimulus onset, no differences in pupil sizes were found during the preparatory phase. Therefore, these results do not support the idea that the observed LWPC effects are due to participants engaging in effortful proactive control.
Hasshim, N., Carruthers, M., Ferrand, L., Augustinova, M., & Parris, B. A. (2024). EXPRESS: No pupillometric evidence for effortful proactive control in the proportion-congruent Stroop paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241235671
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 19, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 15, 2024 |
Publication Date | Feb 15, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Feb 17, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 19, 2024 |
Journal | Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology |
Print ISSN | 1747-0218 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241235671 |
Keywords | Stroop task, Proportion congruency, Cognitive control |
Accepted Version
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
No embargo on AAM. Reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses.
Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?
(2023)
Journal Article
Onset complexity and task conflict in the Stroop task
(2023)
Journal Article
Primacy of mouth over eyes to perceive audiovisual Mandarin lexical tones
(2023)
Journal Article
Two-to-one color-response mapping and the presence of semantic conflict in the Stroop task
(2014)
Journal Article
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search