Scott Bannister
Muddy, muddled, or muffled? Understanding the perception of audio quality in music by hearing aid users
Bannister, Scott; E. Greasley, Alinka; J. Cox, Trevor; A. Akeroyd, Michael; Barker, Jon; Fazenda, Bruno; Firth, Jennifer; N. Graetzer, Simone; Roa Dabike, Gerardo; R. Vos, Rebecca; M. Whitmer, William
Authors
Alinka E. Greasley
Prof Trevor Cox T.J.Cox@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Michael A. Akeroyd
Jon Barker
Dr Bruno Fazenda B.M.Fazenda@salford.ac.uk
Associate Professor/Reader
Jennifer Firth
Simone N. Graetzer
Gerardo Roa Dabike
Dr Rebecca Vos Rebecca.Vos@salford.ac.uk
University Fellow
William M. Whitmer
Abstract
Introduction: Previous work on audio quality evaluation has demonstrated a developing convergence of the key perceptual attributes underlying judgments of quality, such as timbral, spatial and technical attributes. However, across existing research there remains a limited understanding of the crucial perceptual attributes that inform audio quality evaluation for people with hearing loss, and those who use hearing aids. This is especially the case with music, given the unique problems it presents in contrast to human speech.
Method: This paper presents a sensory evaluation study utilising descriptive analysis methods, in which a panel of hearing aid users collaborated, through consensus, to identify the most important perceptual attributes of music audio quality and developed a series of rating scales for future listening tests. Participants (N = 12), with a hearing loss ranging from mild to severe, first completed an online elicitation task, providing single-word terms to describe the audio quality of original and processed music samples; this was completed twice by each participant, once with hearing aids, and once without. Participants were then guided in discussing these raw terms across three focus groups, in which they reduced the term space, identified important perceptual groupings of terms, and developed perceptual attributes from these groups (including rating scales and definitions for each).
Results: Findings show that there were seven key perceptual dimensions underlying music audio quality (clarity, harshness, distortion, spaciousness, treble strength, middle strength, and bass strength), alongside a music audio quality attribute and possible alternative frequency balance attributes.
Discussion: We outline how these perceptual attributes align with extant literature, how attribute rating instruments might be used in future work, and the importance of better understanding the music listening difficulties of people with varied profiles of hearing loss.
Citation
Bannister, S., E. Greasley, A., J. Cox, T., A. Akeroyd, M., Barker, J., Fazenda, B., …M. Whitmer, W. (2024). Muddy, muddled, or muffled? Understanding the perception of audio quality in music by hearing aid users. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1310176
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 9, 2024 |
Publication Date | Feb 21, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Aug 14, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 14, 2024 |
Journal | Frontiers in Psychology |
Publisher | Frontiers Media |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 15 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1310176 |
Files
Published Version
(1.8 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
The First Cadenza Signal Processing Challenge: Improving Music for Those With a Hearing Loss
(2023)
Conference Proceeding
Overview of the 2023 ICASSP SP Clarity Challenge: Speech Enhancement for Hearing Aids
(2023)
Journal Article
Improving the measurement and acoustic performance of transparent face masks and shields
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search