Mr Max Lewin M.Lewin1@salford.ac.uk
Research Fellow
Does plantar pressure in short-term standing differ between modular insoles selected based upon preference or matched to self-reported foot shape?
Lewin, Max; Price, Carina
Authors
Dr Carina Price C.L.Price@salford.ac.uk
Associate Professor/Reader
Abstract
Prolonged workplace standing is commonplace and associated with a range of lower limb issues. Evaluating footwear interventions aiming to modify plantar pressure during standing is essential as the body is static, creating a different requirement for footwear. Previous research associates medial midfoot pressure with greater perceived comfort and identifies arch height as the most variable element of foot shape. Targeting footwear mass customization within this area may better address differences within the target wearers. This study aims to evaluate a modular insole system for its ability to modify plantar pressure during standing. Twenty-five participants completed a static and dynamic standing protocol for 60 seconds whilst measuring in-shoe peak and mean plantar pressure (KPa) and contact area (%). Individuals wore three insole options targeted towards different medial arch shapes (A– low arch, B– medium arch, C– high arch) and rated them for comfort. Participants received guidance to self-identify foot shape (low, medium, or high arch). Comparisons were drawn across the three insole profiles and between the insole rated as most comfortable (preferred), and the insole that matched the self-identified foot shape (matched). As insole arch height increased, medial midfoot pressure and contact area significantly increased, alongside significant reductions in first metatarsal pressure and contact. Preference was spread across insoles A, B, and C (56%, 32%, 12% of participants, respectively). Sixteen participants had different matched and preferred insoles, with significantly greater medial midfoot pressure and contact in the matched insole. The modular insole enabled different wear experiences, however, results suggest that individuals selected insoles lower than their foot shape. Providing adequate medial arch support enables redistribution of pressure which may enable greater comfort during the workday.
Citation
Lewin, M., & Price, C. (2024). Does plantar pressure in short-term standing differ between modular insoles selected based upon preference or matched to self-reported foot shape?. Footwear Science, 16(3), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2024.2363536
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 30, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 23, 2024 |
Publication Date | Jun 23, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Sep 5, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 6, 2024 |
Journal | Footwear Science |
Print ISSN | 1942-4280 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 16 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 209-217 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2024.2363536 |
Files
Published Version
(1.6 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Validation of the RunScribe Inertial Measurement Unit for walking gait measurement
(2022)
Journal Article
Masking approaches to analyse plantar pressure data of new and confident walking infants
(2023)
Journal Article
Validity and reliability of the XSENSOR in-shoe pressure measurement system
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search