Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

R v Noor: a landmark case in female genital mutilation prosecution

Saund-Matharu, Hartej; Home, Joe

Authors

Hartej Saund-Matharu

Joe Home



Abstract

This article on the case of R v Noor (2024) discusses the second successful UK prosecution under the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003, marking a significant legal precedent in addressing female genital mutilation. It underscores the critical role of midwives in detecting, reporting and caring for victims, highlighting the intersection of healthcare, law and ethics in combating this practice. By examining the case of Amina Noor, who took a child abroad for female genital mutilation, the article elucidates the legal ramifications of such acts. It stresses the importance of midwifery awareness, education and collaboration with legal entities to protect women and girls. The article advocates for continuous professional development, the use of legal tools such as female genital mutilation protection orders and a Commissioner to prevent female genital mutilation, emphasising the collective responsibility of healthcare professionals in eradicating this harmful practice and safeguarding vulnerable individuals.

Citation

Saund-Matharu, H., & Home, J. (2024). R v Noor: a landmark case in female genital mutilation prosecution. British Journal of Midwifery, 32(8), 440-445. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2024.32.8.440

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Aug 2, 2024
Deposit Date Jan 16, 2025
Journal British Journal of Midwifery
Print ISSN 0969-4900
Publisher MA Healthcare
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 32
Issue 8
Pages 440-445
DOI https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2024.32.8.440