Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Development and validation of a measure to assess patient experience of needling of arteriovenous fistulas or grafts for haemodialysis access: the NPREM

Moore, Currie; Busby, Amanda; Flanagan, Rebecca; Ellis-Caird, Helen; Awan, Faizan; Paul, Tarsem; Fielding, Catherine; McCafferty, Kieran; N van der Veer, Sabine; Farrington, Ken; Wellsted, David

Development and validation of a measure to assess patient experience of needling of arteriovenous fistulas or grafts for haemodialysis access: the NPREM Thumbnail


Authors

Amanda Busby

Rebecca Flanagan

Helen Ellis-Caird

Faizan Awan

Tarsem Paul

Catherine Fielding

Kieran McCafferty

Sabine N van der Veer

Ken Farrington

David Wellsted



Abstract

Background
Needling is a key step in haemodialysis. Research suggests needling experience is sub-optimal; however, no validated measure exists to inform improvements. We addressed this by developing the Needling Patient Reported Experience Measure (NPREM).

Methods
We used mixed methods and co-production. All participants were adults with working fistulas/grafts from eight UK kidney centres. Phase 1: Developing concepts and items, In interviews (n=41), we explored patients’ needling experience and identified key aspects of needling using thematic analysis. This informed the 98-item NPREM(v0.1). Phase 2: Piloting the measure Cognitive interviews (n=16) assessed face validity. Items were amended or removed, yielding a 48-item NPREM(v0.2). A pilot survey (n=183) examined initial psychometric properties. NPREM(v0.2) showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.95). Review of analyses resulted in a 35-item NPREM(v0.3). Phase 3: Evaluating the measure's dimensionality, validity, and reliability Patients (n=468) completed the NPREM(v0.3), Vascular Access Quality of Life (VASQoL), EuroQol 5-Dimension-5-Level (EQ5D-5L), Patient Activation Measure (PAM), with a sub-set completing a follow-up NPREM (n=99). Items were evaluated with 28 items retained in the NPREM(v1.0). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a unidimensional model fit (CFI=0.899). Validity of the NPREM(v1.0) was good [convergent: VASQoL (r=0.60) and overall experience (r=0.79); divergent: EQ-5D (r=-0.31), EQ-5D VAS (r=0.24) and PAM (r=0.17)]. Test-retest scores were strongly correlated (r=0.88), demonstrating high reliability. Known-groups validity was demonstrated between centre scores (range 5.21 (SD 1.20) to 5.94 (SD 0.75)).

Conclusion
The NPREM measures patient experience of needling for haemodialysis. It offers kidney services a means of assessing needling experience, informing patient-focused clinical and service improvements.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 27, 2025
Online Publication Date Jan 28, 2025
Publication Date Jan 28, 2025
Deposit Date Feb 17, 2025
Publicly Available Date Feb 17, 2025
Journal Clinical Kidney Journal
Print ISSN 2048-8505
Electronic ISSN 2048-8513
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 18
Issue 3
Article Number sfaf029
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf029

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations