Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Is rating of perceived exertion a valid method for monitoring exergaming intensity in type-1 diabetics? A cross-sectional randomized trial

de Brito Gomes, Jorge Luiz; Soltani, Pooya; Rodrigues Barbosa, Rhennan; Adevalton Feitosa Gomes, José; da Cunha Costa, Manoel

Is rating of perceived exertion a valid method for monitoring exergaming intensity in type-1 diabetics? A cross-sectional randomized trial Thumbnail


Authors

Jorge Luiz de Brito Gomes

Pooya Soltani

Rhennan Rodrigues Barbosa

José Adevalton Feitosa Gomes

Manoel da Cunha Costa



Abstract

Aims: The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) provides correlations with physiological measurements of exercise intensity, including metabolic equivalent (MET), oxygen consumption (V̇O2), and heart rate (HR), in real (RS) and virtual (VS) sessions. To use RPE in patients with pathology, we aimed to examine the concurrent validity of RPE in type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients while exergaming.

Methods: Ten T1DM patients performed two 30-min crossover sessions of moderate-intensity exercise (washout 72-196 h). The RS group performed running, and the VS group played the Kinect Adventures! video game. METs were measured by a direct gas analyzer during the sessions, and RPE was measured on the 6 - 20 point Borg scale after the sessions.

Results: RS and VS showed similar RPE (13.2 ± 2.7 vs. 14.2 ± 2.4) and MET (4.6 ± 1.1 vs. 4.0 ± 0.8) values (p > 0.05). RPE vs. MET correlation-coefficients were large in RS (r = 0.64; R2 = 41; p = 0.04) and were moderate in VS (r = 0.42; R2 = 18; p = 0.22). Additionally, RS secondary values (V̇O2 and HR vs. RPE) showed high coefficients (V̇O2-r = 0.62; average HRr = 0.62; maximal HRr = 0.50, p < 0.05). VS secondary values, on the other hand, showed low-moderate coefficients (V̇O2-r = 0.42; average HRr = 0.23; maximal HRr = 0.21, p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The current validation showed that RPE may not be a valid and strong method for T1DM patients while exergaming. Healthcare professionals should cautiously use the 6 – 20 point RPE scale in pathological patients, specifically in T1DM while exergaming.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 9, 2023
Online Publication Date Aug 23, 2023
Publication Date 2023-10
Deposit Date Mar 18, 2025
Publicly Available Date Mar 19, 2025
Journal Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Print ISSN 1360-8592
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 36
Pages 432-437
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.05.018
Keywords Perception, Metabolic equivalent, Diabetes mellitus, Exercise, Video games, Blood glucose

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations