Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): a scoping review

Sanal-Hayes, Nilihan E. M.; Slade, Kate; McLaughlin, Marie; Metcalfe, Paige; Berry, Ethan; Thornton, Eleanor J.; Hayes, Lawrence D.

Therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): a scoping review Thumbnail


Authors

Kate Slade

Marie McLaughlin

Paige Metcalfe

Ethan Berry

Eleanor J. Thornton

Lawrence D. Hayes



Abstract

Background
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is characterised by persistent fatigue, cognitive issues, headaches, disrupted sleep, myalgias, arthralgias, post-exertional malaise (PEM), and orthostatic intolerance. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method using magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain which shows therapeutic potential for conditions like depression, chronic pain, and cognitive impairments. However, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) does not recommend TMS for ME/CFS symptom management, making exploration of its therapeutic potential for people with ME/CFS (PwME) a logical step.

Objective
Our review aimed to systematically search the published literature on therapeutic use of TMS for PwME, map study characteristics and methodologies, and offer recommendations to advance research in this area.

Methods
We conducted a systematic literature search of CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Scopus from 1st January 1985 to 16th February 2024. Only literature in English was included.

Results
Following initial database searches, 1040 articles were identified and a total of three articles met inclusion criteria and were included. This review indicated that, whilst studies indicate positive findings for fatigue-related symptoms and functional abilities, the evidence for rTMS being a promising non-invasive treatment for ME/CFS is limited by small-sample pilot data and the critical absence of control groups within the current literature.

Conclusions
Larger cohorts, control groups, and standardised protocols are needed to improve generalisability and optimise reporting. Future research on rTMS in PwME should focus on feasibility, acceptability, and longer follow-up durations to track symptom improvement.

Journal Article Type Review
Acceptance Date May 20, 2025
Online Publication Date Jun 4, 2025
Deposit Date Jun 10, 2025
Publicly Available Date Jun 11, 2025
Journal Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior
Print ISSN 2164-1846
Electronic ISSN 2164-1862
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Pages 1-20
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/21641846.2025.2513807