Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke (HEADS: UP): An Online Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Stroke Survivors

Lawrence, Maggie; Davis, Bridget; Clark, Naomi E.; Booth, Jo; Donald, Graeme; Dougall, Nadine; Fenocchi, Linda; Grealy, Madeleine; Jamieson, Michelle; Jani, Bhautesh; Kontou, Eirini; MacDonald, Jennifer; Mason, Helen; Maxwell, Margaret; Parkinson, Ben; Pieri, Matilde; Wang, Xu; Mercer, Stewart W.

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke (HEADS: UP): An Online Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Stroke Survivors Thumbnail


Authors

Maggie Lawrence

Bridget Davis

Naomi E. Clark

Jo Booth

Nadine Dougall

Linda Fenocchi

Madeleine Grealy

Michelle Jamieson

Bhautesh Jani

Eirini Kontou

Jennifer MacDonald

Helen Mason

Margaret Maxwell

Ben Parkinson

Matilde Pieri

Xu Wang

Stewart W. Mercer



Abstract

Objectives
The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility and acceptability of a stroke-specific mindfulness-based intervention called Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke (HEADS: UP).

Method
This study was a mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial comparing HEADS: UP to treatment as usual (TAU). HEADS: UP is a 9-week mindfulness intervention for stroke survivors. UK (United Kingdon)-based stroke survivors were recruited and attended HEADS: UP Online. Psychological functioning outcomes measures and other data were collected online at pre-intervention (Week 0), post-intervention (Week 9), and follow-up (months 3 and 6). Participants were randomized 1:1 to either HEADS: UP or TAU.

Results
Sixty-two participants completed baseline questionnaires and were randomized to HEADS: UP (n = 30) or TAU (n = 32). Retention rates were as follows: HEADS: UP (n = 25, 83.30%) versus TAU (n = 25, 78.10%) at post-intervention, HEADS: UP (n = 24, 80%) versus TAU (n = 26, 81.30%) at 3-month follow-up, and HEADS: UP (n = 20, 66.70%) versus TAU (n = 25, 78.10%) at 6-month follow-up. The mean age for HEADS: UP was 56.0 years versus 56.80 for TAU. The HEADS: UP group was 30% male, while the TAU group was 56% male. Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)-21 total mean score for HEADS: UP improved in the direction of expected effect (baseline 46.20, SD (standard deviation) = 24.00; post-intervention 24.00, SD = 16.10) indicating recovery versus no reliable change for TAU (baseline 36.10, SD = 18.70; post-intervention 31.60, SD = 20.40). HEADS: UP and TAU scores continued to improve over time. Between-group effect sizes (Cohen’s d) at post-intervention were large for BAI (Beck Anxiety Inventory) (d = 0.91), DASS-21 total (d = 0.89), and BDI (Beck Depression Inventory)-II (d = 0.86), highlighting the potential of HEADS: UP for improving depression and anxiety symptoms. At the six-month follow-up, the attrition rate was higher in the HEADS: UP group (33.30%) compared with TAU (21.90%).

Conclusions
HEADS: UP is feasible and acceptable and has potential to improve depression and anxiety symptoms for stroke survivors.

Preregistration
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04985838.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 27, 2025
Online Publication Date May 19, 2025
Publication Date May 19, 2025
Deposit Date Jul 23, 2025
Publicly Available Date Jul 23, 2025
Journal Mindfulness
Print ISSN 1868-8527
Electronic ISSN 1868-8535
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-025-02595-8
Publisher URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12671-025-02595-8
Additional Information The version of record of this article, first published in Mindfulness, is available online at Publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12671-025-02595-8

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations