Edward Cox
The Cost-Effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life Intervention for Reducing Sitting Time
Cox, Edward; Walker, Simon; Edwardson, Charlotte L.; Biddle, Stuart J. H.; Clarke-Cornwell, Alexandra M.; Clemes, Stacy A.; Davies, Melanie J.; Dunstan, David W.; Eborall, Helen; Granat, Malcolm H.; Gray, Laura J.; Healy, Genevieve N.; Maylor, Benjamin D.; Munir, Fehmidah; Yates, Thomas; Richardson, Gerry
Authors
Simon Walker
Charlotte L. Edwardson
Stuart J. H. Biddle
Dr Alex Clarke-Cornwell A.M.Clarke-Cornwell@salford.ac.uk
Associate Professor/Reader
Stacy A. Clemes
Melanie J. Davies
David W. Dunstan
Helen Eborall
Prof Malcolm Granat M.H.Granat@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Laura J. Gray
Genevieve N. Healy
Benjamin D. Maylor
Fehmidah Munir
Thomas Yates
Gerry Richardson
Abstract
Sedentary behaviours continue to increase and are associated with heightened risks of morbidity and mortality. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of SMART Work & Life (SWAL), an intervention designed to reduce sitting time inside and outside of work, both with (SWAL-desk) and without (SWAL-only) a height-adjustable workstation compared to usual practice (control) for UK office workers. Health outcomes were assessed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and costs in pound sterling (2019–2020). Discounted costs and QALYs were estimated using regression methods with multiply imputed data from the SMART Work & Life trial. Absenteeism, productivity and wellbeing measures were also evaluated. The average cost of SWAL-desk was £228.31 and SWAL-only £80.59 per office worker. Within the trial, SWAL-only was more effective and costly compared to control (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): £12,091 per QALY) while SWAL-desk was dominated (least effective and most costly). However, over a lifetime horizon, both SWAL-only and SWAL-desk were more effective and more costly than control. Comparing SWAL-only to control generated an ICER of £4985 per QALY. SWAL-desk was more effective and costly than SWAL-only, generating an ICER of £13,378 per QALY. Findings were sensitive to various worker, intervention, and extrapolation-related factors. Based on a lifetime horizon, SWAL interventions appear cost-effective for office-workers conditional on worker characteristics, intervention cost and longer-term maintenance in sitting time reductions.
Citation
Cox, E., Walker, S., Edwardson, C. L., Biddle, S. J. H., Clarke-Cornwell, A. M., Clemes, S. A., …Richardson, G. (2022). The Cost-Effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life Intervention for Reducing Sitting Time. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214861
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 9, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 11, 2022 |
Publication Date | Nov 11, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Nov 14, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 14, 2022 |
Journal | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Publisher | MDPI |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 22 |
Pages | 14861 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214861 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214861 |
Additional Information | Projects : The effectiveness of the SMArT Work & Life intervention for reducing sitting time in office workers |
Files
Published Version
(696 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search