Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The Cost-Effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life Intervention for Reducing Sitting Time

Cox, Edward; Walker, Simon; Edwardson, Charlotte L.; Biddle, Stuart J. H.; Clarke-Cornwell, Alexandra M.; Clemes, Stacy A.; Davies, Melanie J.; Dunstan, David W.; Eborall, Helen; Granat, Malcolm H.; Gray, Laura J.; Healy, Genevieve N.; Maylor, Benjamin D.; Munir, Fehmidah; Yates, Thomas; Richardson, Gerry

The Cost-Effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life Intervention for Reducing Sitting Time Thumbnail


Authors

Edward Cox

Simon Walker

Charlotte L. Edwardson

Stuart J. H. Biddle

Stacy A. Clemes

Melanie J. Davies

David W. Dunstan

Helen Eborall

Laura J. Gray

Genevieve N. Healy

Benjamin D. Maylor

Fehmidah Munir

Thomas Yates

Gerry Richardson



Abstract

Sedentary behaviours continue to increase and are associated with heightened risks of morbidity and mortality. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of SMART Work & Life (SWAL), an intervention designed to reduce sitting time inside and outside of work, both with (SWAL-desk) and without (SWAL-only) a height-adjustable workstation compared to usual practice (control) for UK office workers. Health outcomes were assessed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and costs in pound sterling (2019–2020). Discounted costs and QALYs were estimated using regression methods with multiply imputed data from the SMART Work & Life trial. Absenteeism, productivity and wellbeing measures were also evaluated. The average cost of SWAL-desk was £228.31 and SWAL-only £80.59 per office worker. Within the trial, SWAL-only was more effective and costly compared to control (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): £12,091 per QALY) while SWAL-desk was dominated (least effective and most costly). However, over a lifetime horizon, both SWAL-only and SWAL-desk were more effective and more costly than control. Comparing SWAL-only to control generated an ICER of £4985 per QALY. SWAL-desk was more effective and costly than SWAL-only, generating an ICER of £13,378 per QALY. Findings were sensitive to various worker, intervention, and extrapolation-related factors. Based on a lifetime horizon, SWAL interventions appear cost-effective for office-workers conditional on worker characteristics, intervention cost and longer-term maintenance in sitting time reductions.

Citation

Cox, E., Walker, S., Edwardson, C. L., Biddle, S. J. H., Clarke-Cornwell, A. M., Clemes, S. A., …Richardson, G. (2022). The Cost-Effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life Intervention for Reducing Sitting Time. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214861

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 9, 2022
Online Publication Date Nov 11, 2022
Publication Date Nov 11, 2022
Deposit Date Nov 14, 2022
Publicly Available Date Nov 14, 2022
Journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher MDPI
Volume 19
Issue 22
Pages 14861
DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214861
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214861
Additional Information Projects : The effectiveness of the SMArT Work & Life intervention for reducing sitting time in office workers