Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Urban cooling : which façade orientation has the most impact on a microclimate?

Taleghani, M; Swan, W; Johansson, E; Ji, Y

Urban cooling : which façade orientation has the most impact on a microclimate? Thumbnail


Authors

M Taleghani

E Johansson



Abstract

Deploying solar reflective materials on urban surfaces is known as an effective heat mitigation strategy. Several studies have shown their cooling impacts; however, most of them have focused on rooftops rather than facades. The novelty of this paper is related to exploring the impact of each façade orientation on the corresponding microclimate and energy balance. High albedo materials were implemented on facades with different orientations to explore the potential of each façade. Computer simulations were employed to calculate the insolation of different façades, ground surface temperature, and surface energy balances. The simulations are done for the longest day of the year (21st of June) to have the maximum solar radiation on all facades. The results showed that east-west canyons receive 6 h more direct sun than north-south canyons. This proved that eastern and western facades have the most impact on the microclimate. Cooling east and west facades led to the maximum net radiation reductions for the ground surface. Furthermore, north and south facades had negligible contributions to pedestrian thermal comfort. By understanding the role of each façade, designers and policy makers could deploy cooling materials more effectively on building surfaces.

Citation

Taleghani, M., Swan, W., Johansson, E., & Ji, Y. (2021). Urban cooling : which façade orientation has the most impact on a microclimate?. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102547

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 9, 2020
Online Publication Date Oct 15, 2020
Publication Date Jan 1, 2021
Deposit Date Nov 2, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 15, 2021
Journal Sustainable Cities and Society
Print ISSN 2210-6707
Publisher Elsevier
Volume 64
Pages 102547
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102547
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102547
Related Public URLs http://www.elsevier.com/wps/product/cws_home/724360/description