Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Responsiveness, reliability, and validity of Arabic version of Oxford Knee Score for total knee arthroplasty

Bin sheeha, B; Williams, AE; Johnson, DS; Granat, MH; Bin Nassar, A; Jones, R

Responsiveness, reliability, and validity of Arabic version of Oxford Knee Score for total knee arthroplasty Thumbnail


Authors

B Bin sheeha

AE Williams

DS Johnson

A Bin Nassar



Abstract

Background: The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a reliable, valid, and sensitive assessment tool for individuals undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The published psychometric assessment of the Arabic version of the OKS (OKS-Ar) is limited to male patients and has not been assessed for responsiveness following TKA. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the OKS-Ar in an inclusive population of patients undergoing TKA.
Methods: One hundred Arabic-speaking patients awaiting TKA were assessed with the OKS-Ar, the Arabic version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-Ar), and a visual analogue scale for pain (VAS-P) in order to assess the correlation between the OKS-Ar and the KOOS-Ar and VAS-P and determine the construct validity. Repeat assessments were completed 7 to 10 days after the first assessment and 6 months after TKA.
Results: Questionnaires were completed by 80 female and 20 male participants with a mean age of 62 ± 8 years. The test and retest median scores showed no significant difference from one another, with a strong Spearman correlation between the 2 measurements (rs = 0.94). Bland-Altman limits of agreement showed no significant bias. The Cronbach alpha was 0.85 indicating high internal consistency. There was no floor or ceiling effect before TKA, and the post-TKA ceiling effect was only 2%. The OKS-Ar pain component correlated strongly with the KOOS-Ar pain subscale (rs = 0.73). The OKS-Ar effect size was 3.09, which was larger than that of all of the KOOS subscales at 6 months after TKA.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the OKS-Ar after TKA. The validity and reliability results are similar to those found for both the original English-language OKS and the OKS translated into other languages. We believe that this is also the first study to assess OKS-Ar responsiveness after TKA and to show a large effect size. We found that the OKS-Ar is a feasible, valid, reliable, and sensitive measurement tool to assess pain and function in TKA-treated individuals whose main language is Arabic.

Citation

Bin sheeha, B., Williams, A., Johnson, D., Granat, M., Bin Nassar, A., & Jones, R. (2020). Responsiveness, reliability, and validity of Arabic version of Oxford Knee Score for total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, 102(15), e89. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00949

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 3, 2020
Online Publication Date Jun 23, 2020
Publication Date Aug 5, 2020
Deposit Date Jun 25, 2020
Publicly Available Date Jun 23, 2021
Journal Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Print ISSN 0021-9355
Electronic ISSN 1535-1386
Publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Volume 102
Issue 15
Pages e89
DOI https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00949
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00949
Related Public URLs https://jbjs.org/