B Bin sheeha
Responsiveness, reliability, and validity of Arabic version of Oxford Knee Score for total knee arthroplasty
Bin sheeha, B; Williams, AE; Johnson, DS; Granat, MH; Bin Nassar, A; Jones, R
Authors
AE Williams
DS Johnson
Prof Malcolm Granat M.H.Granat@salford.ac.uk
Professor
A Bin Nassar
Prof Richard Jones R.K.Jones@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
Background: The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a reliable, valid, and sensitive assessment tool for individuals undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The published psychometric assessment of the Arabic version of the OKS (OKS-Ar) is limited to male patients and has not been assessed for responsiveness following TKA. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the OKS-Ar in an inclusive population of patients undergoing TKA.
Methods: One hundred Arabic-speaking patients awaiting TKA were assessed with the OKS-Ar, the Arabic version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-Ar), and a visual analogue scale for pain (VAS-P) in order to assess the correlation between the OKS-Ar and the KOOS-Ar and VAS-P and determine the construct validity. Repeat assessments were completed 7 to 10 days after the first assessment and 6 months after TKA.
Results: Questionnaires were completed by 80 female and 20 male participants with a mean age of 62 ± 8 years. The test and retest median scores showed no significant difference from one another, with a strong Spearman correlation between the 2 measurements (rs = 0.94). Bland-Altman limits of agreement showed no significant bias. The Cronbach alpha was 0.85 indicating high internal consistency. There was no floor or ceiling effect before TKA, and the post-TKA ceiling effect was only 2%. The OKS-Ar pain component correlated strongly with the KOOS-Ar pain subscale (rs = 0.73). The OKS-Ar effect size was 3.09, which was larger than that of all of the KOOS subscales at 6 months after TKA.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the OKS-Ar after TKA. The validity and reliability results are similar to those found for both the original English-language OKS and the OKS translated into other languages. We believe that this is also the first study to assess OKS-Ar responsiveness after TKA and to show a large effect size. We found that the OKS-Ar is a feasible, valid, reliable, and sensitive measurement tool to assess pain and function in TKA-treated individuals whose main language is Arabic.
Citation
Bin sheeha, B., Williams, A., Johnson, D., Granat, M., Bin Nassar, A., & Jones, R. (2020). Responsiveness, reliability, and validity of Arabic version of Oxford Knee Score for total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, 102(15), e89. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00949
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 3, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 23, 2020 |
Publication Date | Aug 5, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Jun 25, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 23, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery |
Print ISSN | 0021-9355 |
Electronic ISSN | 1535-1386 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Volume | 102 |
Issue | 15 |
Pages | e89 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00949 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00949 |
Related Public URLs | https://jbjs.org/ |
Files
OKS-Ar .pdf
(617 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search