S Al-Murshedi
Neonatal chest radiography : influence of standard clinical protocols and radiographic equipment on pathology visibility and radiation dose using a neonatal chest phantom
Al-Murshedi, S; Hogg, P; England, A
Abstract
Introduction: Little is known about the variations in pathology visibility (PV) and their corresponding radiation dose values for neonatal chest radiography, between and within hospitals. Large variations in PV could influence the diagnostic outcome and the variations in radiation dose could affect the risk to patients. The aim of this study is to compare the PV and radiation dose for standard neonatal chest radiography protocols among a series of public hospitals.
Methods: A Gammex 610 neonatal chest phantom was used to simulate the chest region of neonates. Radiographic acquisitions were conducted on 17 X-ray machines located in eight hospitals, utilising their current neonatal chest radiography protocols. Six qualified radiographers assessed PV visually using a relative visual grading analysis (VGA). Signal to noise ratios (SNR) and contrast to noise ratios (CNR) were measured as a measure of image quality (IQ). Incident air kerma (IAK) was measured using a solid-state dosimeter.
Results: PV and radiation dose varied substantially between and within hospitals. For PV, the mean (range) VGA scores, between and within the hospitals, were 2.69 (2.00 to 3.50) and 2.73 (2.33 to 3.33), respectively. For IAK, the mean (range), between and within the hospitals, were 24.45 (8.11 to 49.94) µGy and 34.86 (22.26 to 49.94) µGy, respectively.
Conclusion: Between and within participating hospitals there was wide variation in the visibility of simulated pathology and radiation dose (IAK).
Implications for practice: X-ray units with lower PV and higher doses require optimisation of their standard clinical protocols. Institutions which can offer acceptable levels of PV but with lower radiation doses should help facilitate national optimisation processes.
Citation
Al-Murshedi, S., Hogg, P., & England, A. (2020). Neonatal chest radiography : influence of standard clinical protocols and radiographic equipment on pathology visibility and radiation dose using a neonatal chest phantom. Radiography, 26(4), 282-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.02.005
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 19, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 10, 2020 |
Publication Date | Nov 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Feb 24, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 10, 2021 |
Journal | Radiography |
Print ISSN | 1078-8174 |
Electronic ISSN | 1532-2831 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Volume | 26 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 282-287 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.02.005 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.02.005 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/radiography |
Files
NCR.pdf
(1.3 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Advanced practice among diagnostic radiographers - An international survey
(2024)
Journal Article
Research activity among diagnostic and therapeutic radiographers: An international survey
(2024)
Journal Article
Digital Mammography: A Holistic Approach
(2022)
Book
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search