K Alzyoud
Video Rasterstereography of the spine and pelvis in eight erect positions : a reliability study
Alzyoud, K; Hogg, P; Snaith, B; Preece, SJ; England, A
Authors
Prof Peter Hogg P.Hogg@salford.ac.uk
B Snaith
Prof Stephen Preece S.Preece@salford.ac.uk
Professor Biomechanics & Rehabilitation
A England
Abstract
Introduction
To investigate the reliability and variability of Video Rasterstereography (VR) measurements of the spine and pelvis, for eight proposed standing postures, in order to help define an optimal standing position for erect pelvis radiography.
Methods
Surface topography data were collected using the formetic 4D dynamic modelling (Diers) system. 61 healthy participants were recruited; each participant performed eight different standing positions. Four positions were performed with the feet shoulder width apart and parallel, and four positions were performed with the feet shoulder width apart and internally rotated. For the upper extremity, each of the (two sets of) four positions were performed with different arm positions (arms by the sides, arms crossed over the chest, arms 30o flexed and touching the medial end of the clavicle, arms 30o flexed with the hands holding a support). Three sets of surface topography were collected in the eight positions (n=24). The variability was assessed by calculating standard error of the measurement (SEm) and the coefficient of variation (CV). Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC±95%CI).
Results
No significant differences in the SEm were found between the three paired measurements for all standing positions (P>0.05). ICC values demonstrated excellent reliability for all measurements across the eight standing positions (range 0.879 to 1.00 [95% CI 0.813-1.00]).
Conclusion
Evaluating eight standing positions radiographically would be unethical as it would involve repeat radiation exposures. Using the formetic 4D dynamic modelling (Diers) system, provides an alternative and has shown that there was only a minimal, non-statistically significant, differences between the eight different standing positions.
Citation
Alzyoud, K., Hogg, P., Snaith, B., Preece, S., & England, A. (2020). Video Rasterstereography of the spine and pelvis in eight erect positions : a reliability study. Radiography, 26(1), e7-e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.06.002
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 7, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 27, 2019 |
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Jun 14, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 27, 2020 |
Journal | Radiography |
Print ISSN | 1078-8174 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Volume | 26 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | e7-e13 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.06.002 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.06.002 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.radiographyonline.com/ |
Additional Information | Funders : Jordanian Government |
Files
Video Rasterstereography .pdf
(654 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Comparison of pelvic tilt before and after hip flexor stretching in healthy adults
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search