F Alrehily
Scoliosis imaging : an analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS
Alrehily, F; Hogg, P; Twiste, M; Johansen, S; Tootell, AK
Authors
Prof Peter Hogg P.Hogg@salford.ac.uk
Dr Martin Twiste M.Twiste@salford.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer
S Johansen
AK Tootell
Abstract
Introduction: Scoliosis is defined as a deformity of the spine with lateral curvature in the coronal plane. It requires regular X-ray imaging to monitor the progress of the disorder, therefore scoliotic patients are frequently exposed to radiation. It is important to lower the risk from these exposures for young patients. The aim of this work is to compare organ dose (OD) values resulting from Scan Projection Radiograph (SPR) mode in CT against projection radiography and EOSĀ® imaging system when assessing scoliosis.
Methods: A dosimetry phantom was used to represent a 10-year old child. Thermoluminescent dosimetry detectors were used for measuring OD. The phantom was imaged with CT in SPR mode using 27 imaging parameters; projection radiography and EOS machines using local scoliosis imaging procedures. Imaging was performed in anteroposterior, posteroanterior and lateral projections.
Results: 17 protocols delivered significantly lower radiation dose than projection radiography (p <0.05). OD values from the CT SPR imaging protocols and projection radiography were statistically significant higher than the results from EOS. No statistically significant differences in OD were observed between 10 imaging protocols and those from projection radiography and EOS imaging protocols (p >0.05).
Conclusion: EOS has the lowest dose. Where this technology is not available we suggest there is a potential for OD reduction in scoliosis imaging using CT SPR compared to projection radiography. Further work is required to investigate image quality in relation to the measurement of Cobb angle with CT SPR.
Citation
Alrehily, F., Hogg, P., Twiste, M., Johansen, S., & Tootell, A. (2019). Scoliosis imaging : an analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS. Radiography, 25(3), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.02.005
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 4, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 19, 2019 |
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Feb 8, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 19, 2020 |
Journal | Radiography |
Print ISSN | 1078-8174 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Volume | 25 |
Issue | 3 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.02.005 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.02.005 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiography |
Files
Dose paper_final version.pdf
(293 Kb)
PDF
Version
Accepted Paper
You might also like
Development and validation of a bespoke phantom to test accuracy of Cobb angle measurements
(2019)
Journal Article
The accuracy of Cobb angle measurement on CT scan projection radiograph images
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search