S Al-Murshedi
An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography
Al-Murshedi, S; Hogg, P; England, A
Abstract
Objectives: To determine if a relationship exists between low contrast detail (LCD) detectability using the CDRAD 2.0 phantom, visual measures of image quality (IQ) and simulated lesion visibility (LV) when performing digital chest radiography (CXR).
Methods: Using a range of acquisition parameters, a CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to acquire a set of images with different levels of image quality. LCD detectability using the CDRAD 2.0 phantom, represented by an image quality figure inverse (IQFinv) metric, was determined using the phantom analyser software. A Lungman chest phantom was loaded with two simulated lesions, of different sizes / placed in different locations, and was imaged using the same acquisition factors as the CDRAD phantom. A relative visual grading analysis (VGA) was used by seven observers for IQ and LV evaluation of the Lungman images. Correlations between IQFinv, IQ and LV were investigated.
Results: Pearson’s correlation demonstrated a strong positive correlation (r=0.91; p<0.001) between the IQ and the IQFinv. Spearman’s correlation showed a good positive correlation (r=0.79; p<0.001) and (r=0.68; p<0.001) between the IQFinv and the LV for the first lesion (left upper lobe) and the second lesion (right middle lobe), respectively.
Conclusions: From results presented in this study, the automated evaluation of LCD detectability using CDRAD 2.0 phantom is likely to be a suitable option for IQ and LV evaluation in digital CXR optimisation studies.
Citation
Al-Murshedi, S., Hogg, P., & England, A. (2018). An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography. British Journal of Radiology, 91(1089), https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180317
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 11, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 18, 2018 |
Publication Date | Jun 18, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Jun 14, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 18, 2019 |
Journal | British Journal of Radiology |
Print ISSN | 0007-1285 |
Electronic ISSN | 1748-880X |
Publisher | British Institute of Radiology |
Volume | 91 |
Issue | 1089 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180317 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180317 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.birpublications.org/toc/bjr/current |
Files
P Hogg Final Word version.pdf
(717 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Advanced practice among diagnostic radiographers - An international survey
(2024)
Journal Article
Research activity among diagnostic and therapeutic radiographers: An international survey
(2024)
Journal Article
Digital Mammography: A Holistic Approach
(2022)
Book
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search