A Pérez-Castilla
Assessment of loaded squat jump height with a free-weight barbell and Smith machine : comparison of the take-off velocity and flight time procedures
Pérez-Castilla, A; McMahon, JJ; Comfort, P; García-Ramos, A
Authors
Mr John McMahon J.J.McMahon@salford.ac.uk
Prof Paul Comfort P.Comfort@salford.ac.uk
Professor of Strength & Conditioning
A García-Ramos
Abstract
The aims of this study were to compare the reliability and magnitude of jump height between the two standard procedures of analysing force platform data to estimate jump height (take-off velocity [TOV] and flight time [FT]) in the loaded squat jump (SJ) exercise performed with a free-weight barbell and in a Smith machine. Twenty-three collegiate men (age 23.1 +/- 3.2 years, body mass 74.7 +/- 7.3 kg, height 177.1 +/- 7.0 cm) were tested twice for each SJ type (free-weight barbell and Smith machine) with 17, 30, 45, 60, and 75 kg loads. No substantial differences in reliability were observed between the TOV (Coefficient of variation [CV]: 9.88%; Intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.82) and FT (CV: 8.68%; ICC: 0.88) procedures (CV ratio: 1.14), while the Smith SJ (CV: 7.74%; ICC: 0.87) revealed a higher reliability than the free-weight SJ (CV: 9.88%; ICC: 0.81) (CV ratio: 1.28). The TOV procedure provided higher magnitudes of jump height than the FT procedure for the loaded Smith machine SJ (systematic bias: 2.64 cm; P<0.05), while no significant differences between the TOV and FT procedures were observed in the free-weight SJ exercise (systematic bias: 0.26 cm; P>0.05). Heteroscedasticity of the errors was observed for the Smith machine SJ (r2: 0.177) with increasing differences in favour of the TOV procedure for the trials with lower jump height (i.e. higher external loads). Based on these results the use of a Smith machine in conjunction with the FT more accurately determine jump height during the loaded SJ.
Citation
Pérez-Castilla, A., McMahon, J., Comfort, P., & García-Ramos, A. (2020). Assessment of loaded squat jump height with a free-weight barbell and Smith machine : comparison of the take-off velocity and flight time procedures. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 34(3), 671-677. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002166
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 31, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 31, 2017 |
Publication Date | Mar 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Oct 18, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | May 11, 2020 |
Journal | Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research |
Print ISSN | 1064-8011 |
Electronic ISSN | 1533-4287 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Volume | 34 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 671-677 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002166 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002166 |
Related Public URLs | http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/pages/default.aspx |
Files
Pérez-Castilla et al. (2017).pdf
(480 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Version
Published ahead of print accepted version
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search