Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Lens or prism? How organisations sustain multiple and competing reputations

Harvey, WS; Tourky, M; Knight, E; Kitchen, PJ

Lens or prism? How organisations sustain multiple and competing reputations Thumbnail


Authors

WS Harvey

M Tourky

E Knight

PJ Kitchen



Abstract

Purpose: This paper challenges singular definitions, measurements and applications of corporate reputation which tend to be reductionist. We rebuff such narrow representations of reputation by showing the multiplicity of reputation in the case of a global management consulting firm and demonstrate how it has sustained such reputations.

Design/methodology/approach: Using a large cross-country qualitative case study based on interviews, focus groups, non-participant observations, workshops and a fieldwork diary, dimensions of reputation are highlighted by drawing on perceptions from multiple stakeholder groups in different geographies.

Findings: We find significant differences in perceptions of reputation between and within stakeholder groups, with perceptions changing across dimensions and geographies.

Originality/value: The theoretical implications of the research indicate a plurality of extant reputations, suggesting that a prism is more suited to representing corporate reputation than a singular lens-like focus which is too narrow to constitute reputation.

This paper offers theoretical and practical suggestions for how global firms can build and sustain multiple and competing corporate reputations.

Citation

Harvey, W., Tourky, M., Knight, E., & Kitchen, P. (2017). Lens or prism? How organisations sustain multiple and competing reputations. European Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 821-844. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2016-0122

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 9, 2016
Online Publication Date Nov 11, 2016
Publication Date Apr 10, 2017
Deposit Date Nov 16, 2016
Publicly Available Date Sep 26, 2017
Journal European Journal of Marketing
Print ISSN 0309-0566
Publisher Emerald
Volume 51
Issue 4
Pages 821-844
DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2016-0122
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2016-0122
Related Public URLs http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/ejm

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations