C Mak
Sustainable drainage system site assessment method using urban ecosystem services
Mak, C; Scholz, M; James, P
Abstract
The United Kingdom's recently updated approach to sustainable drainage enhanced biodiversity and amenity objectives by incorporating the ecosystem approach and the
ecosystem services concept. However, cost-effective and reliable methods to appraise the biodiversity and amenity values of potential sustainable drainage system (SuDS)sites and their surrounding areas are still lacking, as is a method to enable designers to distinguish and link the amenity and biodiversity benefits that SuDS schemes can offer. In this paper, therefore, the authors propose two ecosystem services- and disservices-based methods (i.e. vegetation structure cover-abundance examination and cultural ecosystem services and disservices variables appraisal) to aid SuDS designers to distinguish and link amenity and biodiversity benefits, and allow initial site
assessments to be performed in a cost-effective and reliable fashion. Forty-nine representative sites within Greater Manchester were selected to test the two methods.
Amenity and biodiversity were successfully assessed and habitat for species, carbon sequestration, recreation and education ecosystem services scores were produced,which will support SuDS retrofit design decision-making. Large vegetated SuDS sites with permanent aquatic features were found to be most capable of enhancing biodiversity- and amenity-related ecosystem services. Habitat for species and
recreation ecosystem services were also found to be positively linked to each other. Finally, waste bins on site were found to help reduce dog faeces and litter coverage. Overall, the findings presented here enable future SuDS retrofit designs to be more wildlife friendly and socially inclusive.
Citation
Mak, C., Scholz, M., & James, P. (2016). Sustainable drainage system site assessment method using urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosystems, 20(2), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0593-6
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Sep 6, 2016 |
Publication Date | Sep 6, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Sep 1, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 12, 2016 |
Journal | Urban Ecosystems |
Print ISSN | 1083-8155 |
Electronic ISSN | 1573-1642 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Volume | 20 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 293-307 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0593-6 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0593-6 |
Related Public URLs | http://link.springer.com/journal/11252 |
Additional Information | Funders : Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) |
Files
art_10.1007_s11252-016-0593-6.pdf
(1.3 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
The landscape of fear as a safety eco-field: experimental evidence
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search