Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of mouthrinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride

Latimer, J; Munday, JL; Buzza, KM; Forbes, S; Sreenivasan, PK; McBain, AJ

Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of mouthrinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride Thumbnail


Authors

JL Munday

KM Buzza

S Forbes

PK Sreenivasan

AJ McBain



Abstract

Background

Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and sodium fluoride augment oral hygiene by inactivating bacteria and inhibiting enamel demineralisation, respectively. However, there are few reports in the literature documenting the antibacterial efficacy of their combined use in mouthrinses. We have used six experimental systems to compare the antibacterial effects of mouthrinses containing 0.075 % CPC (test rinse, TR) or 0.075 % CPC with sodium fluoride (test fluoride rinse, TFR).


Results

Effects against planktonic bacteria were determined using viable counting (for Streptococcus mutans and salivary bacteria), a redox dye (for Actinomyces viscosus and salivary bacteria) and viable counting (for ex vivo oral rinses). Effects against saliva-derived biofilms were quantified using confocal microscopy and differential viable counting. Inhibition of biofilm formation was evaluated by pre-treating hydroxyapatite coupons with mouthrinses prior to inoculation. Otherwise-identical controls without CPC (control rinse and control fluoride rinse, CR and CFR, respectively), were included throughout. Compared to the controls, TFR and TR demonstrated significant antimicrobial effects in the redox assays, by viable counts (>3 log reductions) and in oral rinse samples (>1.25 log reductions, p < 0.05). TFR and TR also significantly reduced the viability of oral biofilms. Pre-treatment of hydroxyapatite with TFR and TR significantly inhibited biofilm formation (>3 log difference, p < 0.05). Overall, there were no consistent differences in the activities of TR and TFR.

Conclusions

Sodium fluoride did not influence the antibacterial and anti-biofilm potency of CPC-containing formulations, supporting the combined use of CPC and sodium fluoride in mouthrinses to control oral bacteria and protect tooth enamel.

Citation

Latimer, J., Munday, J., Buzza, K., Forbes, S., Sreenivasan, P., & McBain, A. (2015). Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of mouthrinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride. BMC Microbiology, 15(169), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0501-x

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 5, 2015
Online Publication Date Aug 21, 2015
Publication Date Dec 1, 2015
Deposit Date Oct 24, 2016
Publicly Available Date Nov 15, 2018
Journal BMC Microbiology
Electronic ISSN 1471-2180
Publisher Springer Verlag
Volume 15
Issue 169
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0501-x
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0501-x
Related Public URLs http://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/
Additional Information Funders : Colgate Palmolive