Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Predicting the outcome of patients with proximal humeral fracture by radiographic findings : a retrospective study

Callaghan, M; Ball, E

Predicting the outcome of patients with proximal humeral fracture by radiographic findings : a retrospective study Thumbnail


Authors

M Callaghan



Abstract

Background: A retrospective study was undertaken to establish if the outcome of patients with proximal humeral fracture could be predicted by radiographic findings. 12 patients were reviewed with a proximal humeral fracture and were treated conservatively with sling immobilisation, followed by physiotherapy. After each treatment was completed, patient’s radiographs, taken immediately after the initial trauma, were reviewed and the fracture was classified according to Neer and arbeitsgemeinschaft orthopaedie (AO). There were two crucial time points.
Methods: Reviewer one, blinded to the patients’ final functional outcome, attempted to forecast patient functionality by placing each patient into one of 3 broad groups described as ‘good’, ‘moderate’ or ‘poor’ based on the radiographs. Six months after finishing physiotherapy all patients were reassessed functionally by another researcher (reviewer 2), blinded to radiographic classification and prediction. Multiple regression analysis was used to measure outcomes at both interval points.
Results: Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant correlation (R2 0.613, p = 0.014) between the radiographic predicted outcome and the immediate post treatment outcome when adjusting for age. At 6 months review, there was a significant correlation between predicted radiographic outcome and functional outcome when adjusted for patients’ age (R2 0.765 P = 0.001); patients remained in their predicted groups. Six months after physiotherapy only one patient reported being pain free. Poisson linear regression analysis revealed that compared to the patients in the ‘poor’ and ‘moderate’ groups those in the ‘good’ group had 3 treatment sessions wasted (P < 0.001). Those in the ‘poor’ group accounted for 50 out of 76 treatments after their progress had plateaued.
Conclusions: This study indicates that knowledge of the types of proximal humeral fracture classification and accurate radiological diagnosis may help planning conservative treatment realistically and reduce the number of unnecessary physiotherapy treatments.

Citation

Callaghan, M., & Ball, E. Predicting the outcome of patients with proximal humeral fracture by radiographic findings : a retrospective study. Manuscript submitted for publication

Journal Article Type Article
Deposit Date Nov 13, 2014
Publicly Available Date Feb 18, 2019
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed