Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Does IQ measure ability for complex cognition?

Richardson, K.; Norgate, SH

Authors

K. Richardson

SH Norgate



Abstract

A popular conception of the “intelligence,” or g, thought to be measured by IQ tests, is that of
a cognitive “strength” variable that facilitates complex cognition such as reasoning and problem
solving. Yet test items seem remarkably un-complex when compared with everyday cognition.
Here, typical verbal and non-verbal test items are examined and arguments asserting their
complexity are challenged. In contrast, several lines of research indicate how “real life” cognition
is much more complex than that required by such items. The claim that an IQ-job performance
correlation is stronger for more complex jobs is also challenged. This leads to the suggestion
that other sources of variance, including cultural, affective, and other non-cognitive factors, may
explain differences in test performance. An alternative explanation for the still-puzzling “Flynn
effect” is proposed, with the idea that IQ differences reflect cultural “distance” (from possibly
equal, but different, complexities) rather than a universal cognitive “strength.”

Citation

Richardson, K., & Norgate, S. (2014). Does IQ measure ability for complex cognition?. Theory and Psychology, 24(6), 795-812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314551163

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Oct 10, 2014
Deposit Date Oct 24, 2014
Journal Theory & Psychology
Print ISSN 0959-3543
Electronic ISSN 1461-7447
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Issue 6
Pages 795-812
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314551163
Keywords affective, class, complex cognition, culture, intelligence, motivation
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354314551163
Related Public URLs http://www.uk.sagepub.com/journals/Journal200895



Downloadable Citations