Dr Carina Price C.L.Price@salford.ac.uk
Associate Professor/Reader
Does flip-flop style footwear modify ankle biomechanics and foot loading patterns?
Price, C; Andrejevas, V; Findlow, AH; Graham-Smith, P; Jones, R
Authors
V Andrejevas
AH Findlow
P Graham-Smith
R Jones
Abstract
Background
Flip-flops are an item of footwear, which are rubber and loosely secured across the dorsal fore-foot. These are popular in warm climates; however are widely criticised for being detrimental to foot health and potentially modifying walking gait. Contemporary alternatives exist including FitFlop, which has a wider strap positioned closer to the ankle and a thicker, ergonomic, multi-density midsole. Therefore the current study investigated gait modifications when wearing flip-flop style footwear compared to barefoot walking. Additionally walking in a flip-flop was compared to that FitFlop alternative.
Methods
Testing was undertaken on 40 participants (20 male and 20 female, mean ± 1 SD age 35.2 ± 10.2 years, B.M.I 24.8 ± 4.7 kg.m−2). Kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic gait parameters were collected while participants walked through a 3D capture volume over a force plate with the lower limbs defined using retro-reflective markers. Ankle angle in swing, frontal plane motion in stance and force loading rates at initial contact were compared. Statistical analysis utilised ANOVA to compare differences between experimental conditions.
Results
The flip-flop footwear conditions altered gait parameters when compared to barefoot. Maximum ankle dorsiflexion in swing was greater in the flip-flop (7.6 ± 2.6°, p = 0.004) and FitFlop (8.5 ± 3.4°, p < 0.001) than barefoot (6.7 ± 2.6°). Significantly higher tibialis anterior activation was measured in terminal swing in FitFlop (32.6%, p < 0.001) and flip-flop (31.2%, p < 0.001) compared to barefoot. A faster heel velocity toward the floor was evident in the FitFlop (−.326 ± .068 m.s−1, p < 0.001) and flip-flop (−.342 ± .074 m.s−1, p < 0.001) compared to barefoot (−.170 ± .065 m.s−1). The FitFlop reduced frontal plane ankle peak eversion during stance (−3.5 ± 2.2°) compared to walking in the flip-flop (−4.4 ± 1.9°, p = 0.008) and barefoot (−4.3 ± 2.1°, p = 0.032). The FitFlop more effectively attenuated impact compared to the flip-flop, reducing the maximal instantaneous loading rate by 19% (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Modifications to the sagittal plane ankle angle, frontal plane motion and characteristics of initial contact observed in barefoot walking occur in flip-flop footwear. The FitFlop may reduce risks traditionally associated with flip-flop footwear by reducing loading rate at heel strike and frontal plane motion at the ankle during stance.
Citation
Price, C., Andrejevas, V., Findlow, A., Graham-Smith, P., & Jones, R. (2014). Does flip-flop style footwear modify ankle biomechanics and foot loading patterns?. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 7(40), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0040-y
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 4, 2014 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 26, 2014 |
Publication Date | Sep 26, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Dec 8, 2014 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 5, 2016 |
Journal | Journal of Foot and Ankle Research |
Electronic ISSN | 1757-1146 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 7 |
Issue | 40 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0040-y |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0040-y |
Additional Information | Funders : Knowledge Transfer Partnership |
Files
JFAR_Price.pdf
(823 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Masking approaches to analyse plantar pressure data of new and confident walking infants
(2023)
Journal Article
Validity and reliability of the XSENSOR in-shoe pressure measurement system
(2023)
Journal Article
What happens to babies’ feet when they are learning to walk?
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search