Dr Carina Price C.L.Price@salford.ac.uk
Associate Professor/Reader
The effect of unstable sandals on instability in gait in healthy female subjects
Price, C; Smith, L; Graham-Smith, P; Jones, R
Authors
L Smith
P Graham-Smith
Prof Richard Jones R.K.Jones@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
Unstable footwear generally lacks thorough peer-review published research to support concepts and marketing claims. The purpose of this study was to investigate the instability induced by four (FitFlop, Masai Barefoot Technology, Reebok Easy-Tone and Skechers Tone-Ups) commercially available unstable sandals and one stable control sandal (Earth) in walking in 15 females (mean ± SD age was 29 ± 6.7 years, mass 62.6 ± 6.9 kg and height 167.1 ± 4.2 cm). Three-dimensional motion with synchronised electromyography and kinetic data were collected. Walking speed and step length remained consistent between conditions, however double support time decreased in Masai Barefoot Technology. Centre of pressure data identified no consistent difference between the stable control and the unstable sandals, however Masai Barefoot Technology reduced the anterior–posterior range of centre of pressure. Muscle activity differed significantly at the ankle in the unstable footwear. FitFlop, Reebok and Skechers increased peroneal activity during pre-swing, whereas Masai Barefoot Technology increased medial gastrocnemius and decreased tibialis anterior activity in loading response and mid-stance. The larger rocker sole of the Masai Barefoot Technology altered gait and muscle activation with regard to braking and progression in the sagittal plane. Reebok, Skechers and FitFlop, with softer, less stable foreparts increased evertor action at toe-off, having their effect in the coronal plane. The study highlighted that any instability induced by the shoes is design-specific.
Citation
Price, C., Smith, L., Graham-Smith, P., & Jones, R. (2013). The effect of unstable sandals on instability in gait in healthy female subjects. Gait & Posture, 38(3), 410-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.003
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2013 |
Deposit Date | Sep 12, 2014 |
Journal | Gait & Posture |
Print ISSN | 0966-6362 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 38 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 410-415 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.003 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.003 |
Related Public URLs | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/gait-and-posture/ |
You might also like
Masking approaches to analyse plantar pressure data of new and confident walking infants
(2023)
Journal Article
Validity and reliability of the XSENSOR in-shoe pressure measurement system
(2023)
Journal Article
What happens to babies’ feet when they are learning to walk?
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search