Dr Sarah Prenton S.Prenton1@salford.ac.uk
Lecturer in Physiotherapy
Feasibility study of a take-home array-based functional electrical stimulation system with automated setup for current functional electrical stimulation users with foot-drop
Prenton, S; Kenney, LPJ; Stapleton, C; Cooper, G; Reeves, ML; Heller, BW; Sobuh, M; Barker, AT; Healey, J; Good, TR; Thies, SBA; Howard, D; Williamson, T
Authors
Prof Laurence Kenney L.P.J.Kenney@salford.ac.uk
Professor
C Stapleton
G Cooper
ML Reeves
BW Heller
M Sobuh
AT Barker
J Healey
TR Good
Dr Sibylle Thies S.Thies@salford.ac.uk
Associate Professor/Reader
Prof David Howard D.Howard@salford.ac.uk
T Williamson
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the feasibility of unsupervised community use of an array-based automated setup functional electrical stimulator for current foot-drop functional electrical stimulation (FES) users.
Design
Feasibility study.
Setting
Gait laboratory and community use.
Participants
Participants (N=7) with diagnosis of unilateral foot-drop of central neurologic origin (>6mo) who were regular users of a foot-drop FES system (>3mo).
Intervention
Array-based automated setup FES system for foot-drop (ShefStim).
Main Outcome Measures
Logged usage, logged automated setup times for the array-based automated setup FES system and diary recording of problems experienced, all collected in the community environment. Walking speed, ankle angles at initial contact, foot clearance during swing, and the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology version 2.0 (QUEST version 2.0) questionnaire, all collected in the gait laboratory.
Results
All participants were able to use the array-based automated setup FES system. Total setup time took longer than participants' own FES systems, and automated setup time was longer than in a previous study of a similar system. Some problems were experienced, but overall, participants were as satisfied with this system as their own FES system. The increase in walking speed (N=7) relative to no stimulation was comparable between both systems, and appropriate ankle angles at initial contact (N=7) and foot clearance during swing (n=5) were greater with the array-based automated setup FES system.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that an array-based automated setup FES system for foot-drop can be successfully used unsupervised. Despite setup's taking longer and some problems, users are satisfied with the system and it would appear as effective, if not better, at addressing the foot-drop impairment. Further product development of this unique system, followed by a larger-scale and longer-term study, is required before firm conclusions about its efficacy can be reached.
Citation
Prenton, S., Kenney, L., Stapleton, C., Cooper, G., Reeves, M., Heller, B., …Williamson, T. (2014). Feasibility study of a take-home array-based functional electrical stimulation system with automated setup for current functional electrical stimulation users with foot-drop. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(10), 1870-1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.027
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | May 17, 2014 |
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Aug 1, 2014 |
Journal | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation |
Print ISSN | 0003-9993 |
Electronic ISSN | 1532-821X |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 95 |
Issue | 10 |
Pages | 1870-1877 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.027 |
Keywords | Electric stimulation therapy; Gait disorders, neurologic; Hemiplegia; Peroneal nerve; Rehabilitation |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.027 |
Related Public URLs | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/archives-of-physical-medicine-and-rehabilitation/ |
You might also like
Why does my prosthetic hand not always do what it is told?
(2022)
Journal Article
Co-creation and user perspectives for upper limb prosthetics
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search