Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparison of planted soil infiltration systems for treatment of log yard runoff

Hedmark, A; Scholz, M; Aronsson, P; Elowson, T

Comparison of planted soil infiltration systems for treatment of log yard runoff Thumbnail


Authors

A Hedmark

M Scholz

P Aronsson

T Elowson



Abstract

Treatment of log yard runoff is required to avoid
contamination of receiving watercourses. The research aim was to assess
if infiltration of log yard runoff through planted soil systems is successful
and if different plant species affect the treatment performance at a fieldscale
experimental site in Sweden (2005 to 2007). Contaminated runoff
from the log yard of a sawmill was infiltrated through soil planted with
Alnus glutinosa (L.) Ga¨rtner (common alder), Salix schwerinii3viminalis
(willow variety ‘‘Gudrun’’), Lolium perenne (L.) (rye grass), and Phalaris
arundinacea (L.) (reed canary grass). The study concluded that there were
no treatment differences when comparing the four different plants with
each other, and there also were no differences between the tree and the
grass species. Furthermore, the infiltration treatment was effective in
reducing total organic carbon (55%) and total phosphorus (45%)
concentrations in the runoff, even when the loads on the infiltration
system increased from year to year.

Citation

Hedmark, A., Scholz, M., Aronsson, P., & Elowson, T. (2010). Comparison of planted soil infiltration systems for treatment of log yard runoff. Water environment research, 82(7), 666-669. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143009X12529484815917

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 2010
Deposit Date Mar 14, 2012
Publicly Available Date Apr 5, 2016
Journal Water Environment Research
Print ISSN 1061-4303
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 82
Issue 7
Pages 666-669
DOI https://doi.org/10.2175/106143009X12529484815917
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143009X12529484815917
Additional Information Additional Information : Reprinted with permission from Water Environment Research Journal, 82, (7), pp. 666-669, Copyright © 2010 Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Virginia, www.wef.org This paper may be downloaded for personal uses only. Any other use requires prior permission of the Water Environment Federation.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations