Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Impacts of value engineering on five Capital Arts projects

Short, CA; Barrett, PS; Dye, A; Sutrisna, M

Authors

CA Short

PS Barrett

A Dye

M Sutrisna



Abstract

More than £1 billion of public funding has been spent by the Arts Council of England (ACE) Lottery Fund on capital
projects for the Arts. Many of these projects were completed late and over budget. Results from the incremental
cross-case analysis of five contemporary Capital Arts projects are discussed to explore the potential for a more
reliable delivery of Arts clients’ ‘visions’. The findings revealed continuous conflict arising out of the application of
strictly linear project management, reinforced by the sequencing of funders’ awards to match the industry’s custom
and practice work stages. Contemporary ‘re-engineered construction’ presents value engineering as an important tool
for managing financial out-turn. The impact of ‘traditional’ value engineering on the design and delivery of the case
study ‘visions’ is investigated. Stakeholders’ behaviours in managing value are compared with the industry’s idealized
models of cost control and client behaviour. The conclusions drawn indicate the necessity for dynamic management,
enabling more creative iteration later in the process to balance the various stakeholders’ visions, budget and time
requirements. It is suggested that much more guidance is required for clients negotiating the post-feasibility stages of
their capital projects to achieve this balance, and that this could take the form of a common evidence base of
revelatory case studies to which this paper might contribute.

Citation

Short, C., Barrett, P., Dye, A., & Sutrisna, M. (2007). Impacts of value engineering on five Capital Arts projects. Building Research and Information, 35(3), 287-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210601132652

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 2007
Deposit Date Jan 25, 2011
Journal Building Research & Information
Print ISSN 0961-3218
Publisher Routledge
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 35
Issue 3
Pages 287-315
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210601132652
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613210601132652