Comparing the 1996 and 2001 research selectivity exercises in respect of social work

McLaughlin, H; Lawson, J; Shardlow, SM

Abstract

This article compares the outcomes of the 1996 and 2001 research selectivity exercises in respect of their impact upon the discipline of social work in the United Kingdom. Material in respect of the 1996 RAE is principally derived from the study by Lyons and Orme; in respect of the 2001 RAE the material is derived from the study conducted by Salford Centre for Social Work Research. Key findings of the comparison between the RAE 1996 and 2001 reveal the continuation of an upward drift in gradings; that pre-1992 universities have improved their position by achieving higher results; and a reduction in the gap between preand
post-1992 universities. The findings also suggest that institutions have become better players of the RAE ‘game’. There is also evidence of an increased dissatisfaction with the RAE process and outcome between the two RAE exercises.

Citation

McLaughlin, H., Lawson, J., & Shardlow, S. Comparing the 1996 and 2001 research selectivity exercises in respect of social work. Social Work Education, 26(2), 176-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470601042615

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Deposit Date: Oct 28, 2009
• Journal: Social Work Education
• Print ISSN: 0261-5479
• Publisher: Routledge
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 26
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 176-193
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470601042615
• Keywords: RAE; Social Work Research; Research Selectivity
• Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615470601042615