S Cooper
Legal advice and pre-trial silence: Unreasonable developments
Cooper, S
Authors
Abstract
This article examines recent case law concerning the drawing of adverse inferences, pursuant to s. 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, from a suspect’s failure to mention during pre-trial interview facts that he subsequently relies on in court. The cases reveal that even a defendant who genuinely accepts and follows legal advice to remain silent cannot be confident that adverse inferences are precluded. It is argued that more careful thought needs to be given to what constitutes a genuine reliance on legal advice. Suspects who do genuinely rely on bona fide legal advice should not have adverse inferences drawn against them.
Citation
Cooper, S. (2006). Legal advice and pre-trial silence: Unreasonable developments. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 10(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2006.10.1.60
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2006 |
Deposit Date | Jan 12, 2009 |
Journal | International Journal of Evidence and Proof |
Print ISSN | 1365-7127 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 60-69 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2006.10.1.60 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2006.10.1.60 |
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search