Mr Hisham Tariq H.Tariq4@salford.ac.uk
Research Assistant
Measuring Environmental Resilience Using Q-Methods: A Malaysian Perspective
Tariq, Hisham; Pathirage, Chaminda; Fernando, Terrence; Sulaiman, Noralfishah; Nazir, Umber; Abdul Latib, Siti Kursiah Kamalia; Masram, Haidaliza
Authors
Chaminda Pathirage
Prof Terrence Fernando T.Fernando@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Noralfishah Sulaiman
Umber Nazir
Siti Kursiah Kamalia Abdul Latib
Haidaliza Masram
Abstract
Communities increasingly need tools that can help them assess the environmental risks they face to understand better their capacities in mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Environmental resilience (ER) is a crucial feature of community resilience that is not adequately covered in the literature. This paper proposes an inclusive, participatory approach to achieve stakeholder engagement on the definitions, objectives, and indicators for measuring ER at the community level. This study uses a 5-step approach utilising Q-methods to contextualise a resilience index for Environmental Resilience (ER). An initial set of 57 indicators from 13 frameworks from the literature was reduced to 25 by combining the indicators of similar type, format and terminology. A total of 10 participants from two groups (academics and practitioners) took part in the interviews and Q-sort workshops in Malaysia in this study. Both stakeholder groups identified Ecosystem monitoring as one of the most critical indicators to understand ER, closely followed by rapid damage assessments and an effective communication system. The exercise also revealed marked differences between them regarding the importance of fair access to basic needs and services for citizens, a priority for academics, and the value of building green infrastructure, a priority for practitioners, with the most significant difference between the two groups on the importance of measuring the natural defences of a community. The Environmental Resilience Capacity Assessment Tool (ER-CAT), proposed in this paper, can be used by local governments and communities for engagement, discussion and consensus building to select the resilience indicators that are most relevant to them in their contexts.
Citation
Tariq, H., Pathirage, C., Fernando, T., Sulaiman, N., Nazir, U., Abdul Latib, S. K. K., & Masram, H. (2022). Measuring Environmental Resilience Using Q-Methods: A Malaysian Perspective. Sustainability, 14(22), 14749. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214749
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 1, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 9, 2022 |
Publication Date | 2022-11 |
Deposit Date | Jul 4, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 5, 2023 |
Journal | Sustainability |
Publisher | MDPI |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 14 |
Issue | 22 |
Pages | 14749 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214749 |
Keywords | Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law; Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment; Geography, Planning and Development; Building and Construction |
Files
Published Version
(1.2 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
A-Priori Framework for Community Transformation for Inclusive and Risk-Sensitive Urban Developments
(2022)
Presentation / Conference
Climate financing barriers and strategies : the case of Sri Lanka
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search