The Benefits and Limitations of Predicting One Repetition Maximum Using the Load-Velocity Relationship

Alistair J., McBurnie; Kieran P., Allen; Maybanks, Garry; McDwyer, Martin; Dos'Santos, Thomas; Paul A., Jones; Paul, Comfort; John J., McMahon

Abstract

This review aims to provide an overview of the current load-velocity (L-V) approaches and their ability to estimate one-repetition maximum (1RM). The bench press exercise appears to be the most valid and reliable when applying this approach. The ability for L-V relationship to predict 1RM for lower-body lifts remains questionable. Individualized regression equations should be used alongside mean velocity when utilizing this method during the bench press. The 2-point method (2 distinguishable loads, as opposed to multiple loads) and normative velocity data (minimal velocity thresholds at 1RM) may provide a novel and practical way to assess athletes' 1RM.

Citation

Alistair J., M., Kieran P., A., Maybanks, G., McDwyer, M., Dos'Santos, T., Paul A., J., …John J., M. (2019). The Benefits and Limitations of Predicting One Repetition Maximum Using the Load-Velocity Relationship. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 41(6), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000496

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: 2019-12
• Deposit Date: Aug 1, 2023
• Journal: Strength and Conditioning Journal
• Print ISSN: 1524-1602
• Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 41
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 28-40
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000496